Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Complementarity of Mindshaping and Mindreading.Uwe Peters - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-17.
    Why do we engage in folk psychology, that is, why do we think about and ascribe propositional attitudes such as beliefs, desires, intentions etc. to people? On the standard view, folk psychology is primarily for mindreading, for detecting mental states and explaining and/or predicting people’s behaviour in terms of them. In contrast, McGeer (1996, 2007, 2015), and Zawidzki (2008, 2013) maintain that folk psychology is not primarily for mindreading but for mindshaping, that is, for moulding people’s behavior and minds (e.g., (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark