Switch to: References

Citations of:

M. poincaré's science et hypothése

Mind 15 (57):141-b-143 (1906)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Poincaré Against the Logicians.Michael Detlefsen - 1992 - Synthese 90 (3):349 - 378.
    Poincaré was a persistent critic of logicism. Unlike most critics of logicism, however, he did not focus his attention on the basic laws of the logicists or the question of their genuinely logical status. Instead, he directed his remarks against the place accorded to logical inference in the logicist's conception of mathematical proof. Following Leibniz, traditional logicist dogma (and this is explicit in Frege) has held that reasoning or inference is everywhere the same — that there are no principles of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Gottlob Frege, One More Time1.Claude Imbert - 2000 - Hypatia 15 (4):156-173.
    Frege's philosophical writings, including the “logistic project,” acquire a new insight by being confronted with Kant's criticism and Wittgenstein's logical and grammatical investigations. Between these two points a non-formalist history of logic is just taking shape, a history emphasizing the Greek and Kantian inheritance and its aftermath. It allows us to understand the radical change in rationality introduced by Gottlob Frege's syntax. This syntax put an end to Greek categorization and opened the way to the multiplicity of expressions producing their (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  • Two Types of Scientific Research.Stefan Ziemski - 1979 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10 (2):338-342.
    On the basis of an analysis of different types of research, two main kinds may be distinguished: research with a general intention and research with an individual intention.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  • Poincaré Vs. Russell on the Rôle of Logic in Mathematicst.Michael Detlefsen - 1993 - Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):24-49.
    In the early years of this century, Poincaré and Russell engaged in a debate concerning the nature of mathematical reasoning. Siding with Kant, Poincaré argued that mathematical reasoning is characteristically non-logical in character. Russell urged the contrary view, maintaining that (i) the plausibility originally enjoyed by Kant's view was due primarily to the underdeveloped state of logic in his (i.e., Kant's) time, and that (ii) with the aid of recent developments in logic, it is possible to demonstrate its falsity. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   9 citations