Switch to: References

Citations of:

The logical foundations of means-end reasoning

In Renée Elio (ed.), Common Sense, Reasoning, & Rationality. Oxford University Press. pp. 60 (2002)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Decision theory, intelligent planning and counterfactuals.Michael John Shaffer - 2008 - Minds and Machines 19 (1):61-92.
    The ontology of decision theory has been subject to considerable debate in the past, and discussion of just how we ought to view decision problems has revealed more than one interesting problem, as well as suggested some novel modifications of classical decision theory. In this paper it will be argued that Bayesian, or evidential, decision-theoretic characterizations of decision situations fail to adequately account for knowledge concerning the causal connections between acts, states, and outcomes in decision situations, and so they are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Means-end relations and a measure of efficacy.Jesse Hughes, Albert Esterline & Bahram Kimiaghalam - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):83-108.
    Propositional dynamic logic (PDL) provides a natural setting for semantics of means-end relations involving non-determinism, but such models do not include probabilistic features common to much practical reasoning involving means and ends. We alter the semantics for PDL by adding probabilities to the transition systems and interpreting dynamic formulas 〈α〉 ϕ as fuzzy predicates about the reliability of α as a means to ϕ. This gives our semantics a measure of efficacy for means-end relations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Semantics for Means-end Relations.Jesse Hughes, Peter Kroes & Sjoerd Zwart - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):207-231.
    There has been considerable work on practical reasoning in artificial intelligence and also in philosophy. Typically, such reasoning includes premises regarding means–end relations. A clear semantics for such relations is needed in order to evaluate proposed syllogisms. In this paper, we provide a formal semantics for means–end relations, in particular for necessary and sufficient means–end relations. Our semantics includes a non-monotonic conditional operator, so that related practical reasoning is naturally defeasible. This work is primarily an exercise in conceptual analysis, aimed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations