Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Emergent Evolutionism, Determinism and Unpredictability.Olivier Sartenaer - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:62-68.
    The fact that there exist in nature thoroughly deterministic systems whose future behavior cannot be predicted, no matter how advanced or fined-tune our cognitive and technical abilities turn out to be, has been well established over the last decades or so, essentially in the light of two different theoretical frameworks, namely chaos theory and (some deterministic interpretation of) quantum mechanics. The prime objective of this paper is to show that there actually exists an alternative strategy to ground the divorce between (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Puccetti and brain bisection: An attempt at mental division.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (September):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Empirical theology in the light of science.Karl E. Peters - 1992 - Zygon 27 (3):297-325.
  • Brain, mind and soul.Grant R. Gillett - 1985 - Zygon 20 (December):425-434.
    We view a human being as a mental and spiritual entity and also as having a physical nature. The essence of a person is revealed in our thinking about personal identity, quality of life, and personal responsibility. These conceptions do not fare well in a Cartesian or dualist picture of the person as there are deep problems with the idea that the mind is an inner realm. I argue that it is only as we see the thoughts, actions, and interactions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is the mind-body problem empirical?Jeffrey Foss - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (September):505-32.
    There is no problem more paradigmatically philosophical than the mind-body problem. Nevertheless, I will argue that the problem is empirical. I am not even suggesting that conceptual analysis of the various mind-body theories be abandoned – just as I could not suggest it be abandoned for theories in physics or biology. But unlike the question, ‘Is every even number greater than 2 equal to the sum of two primes?’ the mind-body problem cannot be solved a priori, by analysis alone; though (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Misuse and Failure of the Evolutionary Argument.Joseph Corabi - 2014 - Disputatio 6 (39):199-227.
    The evolutionary argument is an argument against epiphenomenalism, designed to show that some mind-body theory that allows for the efficacy of qualia is true. First developed by Herbert Spencer and William James, the argument has gone through numerous incarnations and it has been criticized in a number of different ways. Yet many have found the criticisms of the argument in the literature unconvincing. Bearing this in mind, I examine two primary issues: first, whether the alleged insights employed in traditional versions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Popper's 'world 3' and the problem of the printed line.Rolin Church - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):378 – 391.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Popper’s Theory of World 3 and the Evolution of the Internet.Peter Backes - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (3):265-287.
    While developing his theory of world 3, Popper rejects two claims made by Plato: first, that the inhabitants of world 3, ideas, are a source of ultimate explanation, a divine revelation of truth, and second, that these ideas are unchanging. I will rehabilitate the second claim. Man does not construct world 3 by creating his theories, nor is it a source of ultimate truth. Instead, world 3 is discovered by man, and it destroys some of his theories: destructive Platonism. I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation