Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Authenticity Anyone? The Enhancement of Emotions Via Neuro-Psychopharmacology.Felicitas Kraemer - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (1):51-64.
    This article will examine how the notion of emotional authenticity is intertwined with the notions of naturalness and artificiality in the context of the recent debates about ‘neuro-enhancement’ and ‘neuro-psychopharmacology.’ In the philosophy of mind, the concept of authenticity plays a key role in the discussion of the emotions. There is a widely held intuition that an artificial means will always lead to an inauthentic result. This article, however, proposes that artificial substances do not necessarily result in inauthentic emotions. The (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Indeterminacy of Definitions and Criteria in Mental Health: Case Study of Emotional Disorders.George Nikolaidis - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):531-536.
  • A Dispositional Theory of Love.Hichem Naar - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):342-357.
    On a naive reading of the major accounts of love, love is a kind of mental event. A recent trend in the philosophical literature on love is to reject these accounts on the basis that they do not do justice to the historical dimension of love, as love essentially involves a distinctive kind of temporally extended pattern. Although the historicist account has advantages over the positions that it opposes, its appeal to the notion of a pattern is problematic. I will (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Emotional Intelligence and Moral Agency: Some Worries and a Suggestion.Sophie Rietti - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):143 – 165.
    Emotional intelligence (EI) has been put forward as a distinctive kind of intelligence and, by popularizers such as Daniel Goleman, as an indicator of moral and life skills. Critics, however, have been concerned EI-testing measures conformity or the ability to manipulate own or others' emotions, and relies on a problematic assumption that there are definitive, universal “right” answers when it comes to feelings. Such worries have also been raised about the original concept developed by Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer; (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation