Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Cancellation, Negation, and Rejection.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, Peter Collins, Karolina Krzyżanowska, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2019 - Cognitive Psychology 108:42-71.
    In this paper, new evidence is presented for the assumption that the reason-relation reading of indicative conditionals ('if A, then C') reflects a conventional implicature. In four experiments, it is investigated whether relevance effects found for the probability assessment of indicative conditionals (Skovgaard-Olsen, Singmann, and Klauer, 2016a) can be classified as being produced by a) a conversational implicature, b) a (probabilistic) presupposition failure, or c) a conventional implicature. After considering several alternative hypotheses and the accumulating evidence from other studies as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The Relation Between Factual and Counterfactual Conditionals.Ana Cristina Quelhas, Célia Rasga & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (7):2205-2228.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Truth of Conditional Assertions.Geoffrey P. Goodwin & P. N. Johnson‐Laird - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (8):2502-2533.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Facts and Possibilities: A Model‐Based Theory of Sentential Reasoning.Sangeet S. Khemlani, Ruth M. J. Byrne & Philip N. Johnson‐Laird - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (6):1887-1924.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The Analytic Truth and Falsity of Disjunctions.Ana Cristina Quelhas, Célia Rasga & P. N. Johnson‐Laird - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (9).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Links Between Mythology and Philosophy: Homer’s Iliad and Current Criteria of Rationality.Miguel López Astorga - 2019 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 23 (1):69-78.
    It is usually said that there is a clear difference between pre-philosophical texts such as Homer’s Iliad and what is provided in the fragments corresponding to first philosophers such as Thales of Miletus. This paper tries to show that this is not undoubtedly so, and it does that by means of the analysis of a fragment of the Iliad in which Hypnos is speaking. In this way, the main argument is that, while the fragment can be interpreted both in a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Gorgias’ Argument Does Not Include Actual Conditionals.Miguel López - Astorga - 2018 - Problemos 93.
    [straipsnis ir santrauka anglų kalba, santrauka lietuvių kalba] It can be thought that Gorgias’ argument on the non-existence consists of three sentences, the first one being an asseveration and the other two being conditionals. However, this paper is intended to show that there is no conditional in the argument, and that the second and third sentences only appear to be so. To do that, a methodology drawn from the framework of the mental models theory is used, which seems to lead (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark