Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy.Andrea Polonioli - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4):1009-1034.
    This paper examines a constellation of ethical and editorial issues that have arisen since philosophers started to conduct, submit and publish empirical research. These issues encompass concerns over responsible authorship, fair treatment of human subjects, ethicality of experimental procedures, availability of data, unselective reporting and publishability of research findings. This study aims to assess whether the philosophical community has as yet successfully addressed such issues. To do so, the instructions for authors, submission process and published research papers of 29 main (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy.Andrea Polonioli - forthcoming - Science and Engineering Ethics.
    This paper examines a constellation of ethical and editorial issues that have arisen since philosophers started to conduct, submit and publish empirical research. These issues encompass concerns over responsible authorship, fair treatment of human subjects, ethicality of experimental procedures, availability of data, unselective reporting and publishability of research findings. This study aims to assess whether the philosophical community has as yet successfully addressed such issues. To do so, the instructions for authors, submission process and published research papers of 29 main (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Highlights in Bioethics Through 40 Years: A Quantitative Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles.Pingyue Jin & Mark Hakkarinen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):339-345.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-Authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.Daniela Cutas & David Shaw - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1315-1329.
    The various problems associated with co-authorship of research articles have attracted much attention in recent years. We believe that this growing awareness is a very welcome development. However, we will argue that the particular and increasing importance of authorship and the harmful implications of current practices of research authorship for junior researchers have not been emphasised enough. We will use the case of our own research area to illustrate some of the pitfalls of current publishing practices—in particular, the impact on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
    Multiple authorship is becoming increasingly common in bioethics research. There are well-established criteria for authorship in empirical bioethics research but not for conceptual research. It is important to develop criteria for authorship in conceptual publications to prevent undeserved authorship and uphold standards of fairness and accountability. This article explores the issue of multiple authorship in bioethics and develops criteria for determining who should be an author on a conceptual publication in bioethics. Authorship in conceptual research should be based on contributing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Conflicts of Interest Policies for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors of Bioethics Journals.Zubin Master, Kelly Werner, Elise Smith, David B. Resnik & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):194-205.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark