Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Genetic Privacy: Might There Be a Moral Duty to Share One's Genetic Information?Heidi Malm - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):52-54.
    In discussions about direct-to-consumer availability of genetic testing, much attention has been given to identifying the various risks and benefits that individuals might incur. For example, upon...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Challenges in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing in Children.Holly K. Tabor & Maureen Kelley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):32-34.
    In the target article, McGuire and colleagues (2009) found that 54% of social networkers would consider using direct-to-consumer personal genome testing (DTC PGT) for their child and that 63% agree...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):1-3.
    The convergence of increasingly efficient high throughput sequencing technology and ubiquitous Internet use by the public has fueled the proliferation of companies that provide personal genetic information direct-to-consumers. Companies such as 23andme and Navigenics are emblematic of a growing market for PGI that some argue represents a paradigm shift in how the public values this information and incorporates it into how they behave and plan for their futures. This new class of social networking business ventures that market the science of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Direct-to-Consumer Genome-Wide Scans: Astrologicogenomics or Simple Scams?Wayne Hall & Coral Gartner - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):54-56.