Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Mannheim for All Seasons: Bloor, Merton, and the Roots of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.David Kaiser - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (1):51-87.
  • Introduction: Social Epistemology Meets the Philosophy of the Humanities.Anton Froeyman, Laszlo Kosolosky & Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):1-13.
    From time to time, when I explain to a new acquaintance that I’m a philosopher of science, my interlocutor will nod agreeably and remark that that surely means I’m interested in the ethical status of various kinds of scientific research, the impact that science has had on our values, or the role that the sciences play in contemporary democracies. Although this common response hardly corresponds to what professional philosophers of science have done for the past decades, or even centuries, it (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Husserlian Affinities in Simmel's Philosophy of History: The 1918 Essay. [REVIEW]Gary Backhaus - 2003 - Human Studies 26 (2):223-258.
  • Discussion Review of Nersessian (Ed.) The Process of Science. [REVIEW]Steve Fuller - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (1):121-129.
  • The Role of Umwelt in Husserl’s Aufbau and Abbau of the Natur/Geist Distinction.Adam Konopka - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):313 - 333.
    In this essay I argue that Husserl’s development of the nineteenth century Natur/Geist distinction is grounded in the intentional correlate between the pre-theoretical natural attitude and environing world ( Umwelt ). By reconsidering the Natur/Geist distinction through its historical context in the nineteenth century debate between Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians from the Baden or Southwest school, it is possible to understand more clearly Husserl’s appropriations and novel contributions. One of Husserl’s contributions lies in his rigorous thematization and clarification of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Editorial Introduction.Damian Veal - 2005 - Angelaki 10 (1):1 – 31.
  • Explaining the Past in the Geosciences.Robert John Inkpen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):495-507.
    Abductive reasoning is central to reconstructing the past in the geosciences. This paper outlines the nature of the abductive method and restates it in Bayesian terms. Evidence plays a key role in this working method and, in particular, traces of the past are important in this explanatory framework. Traces, whether singularly or as groups, are interpreted within the context of the event for which they have evidential claims. Traces are not considered as independent entities but rather as inter-related pieces of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
  • Time, Death, and History in Simmel and Heidegger.John E. Jalbert - 2003 - Human Studies 26 (2):259-283.