Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Moral Epistemology is Not Just Epistemology Applied to Moral Beliefs.Sushruth Ravish & Chaitanya Joshi - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):71-92.
    The current discourse on moral epistemology (ME), has hardly paid any attention to the question concerning the demarcation of the domain of ME within epistemology. Neither is the subject matter of ME considered unique, nor is the methodology adopted in its investigations considered distinct. We attempt to show in this paper that this omission does not restrict itself to a mere taxonomical oversight but rather leads to certain deeper conceptual concerns. We argue that a casual and porous understanding of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Autonomy as Non‐Alienation, Autonomy as Sovereignty, and Politics.David Enoch - 2022 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):143-165.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 2, Page 143-165, June 2022.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Methodological Implications of Reference Magnetism on Moral Twin Earth.David Mokriski - 2020 - Metaphilosophy 51 (5):702-726.
    The Moral Twin Earth challenge to ethical naturalism threatens to undermine an otherwise promising metaethical view by showing that typical, naturalist-friendly theories of reference determination predict diverging reference in Twin Earth scenarios, making it difficult to account for substantive moral disagreement. Several theorists have recently invoked David Lewis’s doctrine of reference magnetism as a solution, claiming that a highly elite moral property—a moral “joint in nature”—could secure shared reference between ourselves and our twins on Twin Earth, despite our diverging usages (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Book Review: A Discussion of Victor Tadros, Wrongs and Crimes. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), Pp. 368, $115.00. [REVIEW]Arudra Burra - 2021 - Law and Philosophy 40 (4):455-462.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Particularism for Generalists: A Rossian Business Ethic.J. Drake - forthcoming - Business Ethics Quarterly.
    A standard framework for business ethics views the inquiry as an application of major ethical theories to specific issues in business. As these theories are largely presented as being principled, the exercise therefore becomes one of applying general principles to business situations. Many adopting this standard approach have thus resisted the implementation of the most prominent development in ethical theory in recent history: that of particularism. In this article, I argue that particularist thinking has much to offer to business ethics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Book Review. [REVIEW]Arudra Burra - forthcoming - Law and Philosophy:1-8.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Meta-Metasemantics, or the Quest for the One True Metasemantics.Ethan Nowak & Eliot Michaelson - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):135-154.
    What determines the meaning of a context-sensitive expression in a context? It is standardly assumed that, for a given expression type, there will be a unitary answer to this question; most of the literature on the subject involves arguments designed to show that one particular metasemantic proposal is superior to a specific set of alternatives. The task of the present essay will be to explore whether this is a warranted assumption, or whether the quest for the one true metasemantics might (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation