Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Russell and His Sources for Non-Classical Logics.Irving H. Anellis - 2009 - Logica Universalis 3 (2):153-218.
    My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Indefinite Divisibility.Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):239-263.
    Some hold that the lesson of Russell’s paradox and its relatives is that mathematical reality does not form a ‘definite totality’ but rather is ‘indefinitely extensible’. There can always be more sets than there ever are. I argue that certain contact puzzles are analogous to Russell’s paradox this way: they similarly motivate a vision of physical reality as iteratively generated. In this picture, the divisions of the continuum into smaller parts are ‘potential’ rather than ‘actual’. Besides the intrinsic interest of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Equivalence of Hypotheses and Galilean Censure in Leibniz: A Conspiracy or a Way to Moderate Censure?Laurynas Adomaitis - 2019 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 72 (1):63-85.
    Spending six months in Rome in 1689 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) occupied himself with the question of Copernican and Galilean censure. An established reading of the Rome papers suggests that Leibniz’s attempt to have the Copernican censure lifted was derived solely from the equivalence of hypotheses stemming from the relativity of motion; and involved Leibniz’s compromising his belief in the truth of the Copernican hypothesis by arguing that it should only be interpreted instrumentally; and that Leibniz believed in the unrestricted (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Grandeurs, vecteurs et relations chez Russell (1897-1903).Sébastien Gandon - 2006 - Philosophiques 33 (2):333-361.
    La théorie russellienne des relations est ordinairement conçue comme le résultat d'une réflexion logique et ontologique sur l'ordre et l'asymétrie. Le présent article vise à présenter une autre généalogie, centrée sur les concepts de grandeur et de vecteur. Nous montrons en premier lieu que la thèse de l'irréductibilité des relations est avancée pour la première fois en 1897, à l'occasion d'une reformulation de la dialectique hégélienne de la quantité. Nous soulignons, en second lieu, que la notion de grandeur fait, autour (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Da Verdadeira Theologia Mystica.Ulysses Pinheiro - 2018 - Cadernos Espinosanos 39:391-424.
    Tradução do texto "Da verdadeira Theologia Mystica", de G. W. Leibniz.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Causa Sui or Wechselwirkung: Engels Between Spinoza and Hegel.Vittorio Morfino - 2008 - Historical Materialism 16 (1):9-35.
  • The Interval of Motion in Leibniz's Pacidius Philalethi.Samuel Levey - 2003 - Noûs 37 (3):371–416.