Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Should Epidemiological Studies Be Subject to Ethics Review?Jan Piasecki, Vilius Dranseika & Marcin Waligora - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):213-220.
    Epidemiological studies usually do not pose high risk to participants. At the same time they provide valuable knowledge and improve public and individual health. In many countries, studies involving human subjects are subject to ethics review. Research shows that the process of obtaining ethical approval from institutional research boards or research ethics committees is sometimes costly, time-consuming and seriously delays important research projects. In this article we consider arguments against and in favor of ethics review of epidemiological studies. On the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Not to Argue Against Mandatory Ethics Review.D. Hunter - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):521-524.
    There is considerable controversy about the mandatory ethics review of research. This paper engages with the arguments offered by Murray Dyck and Gary Allen against mandatory review, namely, that this regulation fails to reach the standards that research ethics committees apply to research since it is harmful to the ethics of researchers, has little positive evidence base, leads to significant harms (through delaying valuable research) and distorts the nature of research. As these are commonplace arguments offered by researchers against regulation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Job of ‘Ethics Committees’.Andrew Moore & Andrew Donnelly - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):481-487.
    What should authorities establish as the job of ethics committees and review boards? Two answers are: review of proposals for consistency with the duly established and applicable code and review of proposals for ethical acceptability. The present paper argues that these two jobs come apart in principle and in practice. On grounds of practicality, publicity and separation of powers, it argues that the relevant authorities do better to establish code-consistency review and not ethics-consistency review. It also rebuts bad code and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Service Evaluation: A Grey Area of Research?Lu-Yen A. Chen & Tonks N. Fawcett - forthcoming - Nursing Ethics:096973301774296.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Third Way: Ethics Guidance as Evidence-Informed Provisional Rules.Kirstin Borgerson & Joseph Millum - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):20-22.
  • In Defense of Valid Design as a Policy Rule.Emily L. Evans - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):18-19.
  • Public Trust as a Policy Goal for Research With Human Subjects.David B. Resnik - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):15-17.
  • Ethical Rules for Human Subjects Research: A Case Where the “Is” Must Inform the “Ought”.Alexander A. Kon - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):14-15.
    (2010). Ethical Rules for Human Subjects Research: A Case Where the “Is” Must Inform the “Ought”. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 14-15.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is There a Case for a Distinction Between Ethics and Policy?David Hunter - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):24-25.
  • Ethical Rules, Policies, or Guidance?Ruth Macklin - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An Absence of Evidence in “Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Jason Gerson & Steven Goodman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):22-23.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Case for Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Benjamin Sachs - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):1-3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark