Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Risk aversion for losses and the Nash bargaining solution.Hans Peters - 2021 - Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):703-715.
    We call a decision maker risk averse for losses if that decision maker is risk averse with respect to lotteries having alternatives below a given reference alternative in their support. A two-person bargaining solution is called invariant under risk aversion for losses if the assigned outcome does not change after correcting for risk aversion for losses with this outcome as pair of reference levels, provided that the disagreement point only changes proportionally. We present an axiomatic characterization of the Nash bargaining (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion.Zhongwei Feng & Chunqiao Tan - 2019 - Complexity 2019:1-23.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Credibilistic Loss Aversion Nash Equilibrium for Bimatrix Games with Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs.Chunsheng Cui, Zhongwei Feng & Chunqiao Tan - 2018 - Complexity 2018:1-16.
    Inspired by Shalev’s model of loss aversion, we investigate the effect of loss aversion on a bimatrix game where the payoffs in the bimatrix game are characterized by triangular fuzzy variables. First, we define three solution concepts of credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria, and their existence theorems are presented. Then, three sufficient and necessary conditions are given to find the credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria. Moreover, the relationship among the three credibilistic loss aversion Nash equilibria is discussed in detail. Finally, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Fairness motivation in bargaining: a matter of principle. [REVIEW]Sigbjørn Birkeland & Bertil Tungodden - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (1):125-151.
    In this paper, we study the role of fairness motivation in bargaining. We show that bargaining between two strongly fairness motivated individuals who have different views about what represents a fair division may end in disagreement. Further, by applying the Nash bargaining solution, we study the influence of fairness motivation on the bargaining outcome when an agreement is reached. In particular, we show that the bargaining outcome is sensitive to the fairness motivation of the two individuals, unless they both consider (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations