Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Transgenic Animals, Biomedical Experiments, and "Progress".Kay Peggs - 2013 - Journal of Animal Ethics 3 (1):41-56.
    By conducting a critical discourse analysis of a scientific research article that claims additional potential for using transgenic marmosets in biomedical experiments, this article critiques instrumental approaches to scientific progress as they are expressed in scientific research that uses nonhuman animal experiments. Following an analysis that focuses on issues associated with access to publication, assertions about scientific breakthrough and scientific facts, and the construction of science as impartial, the article concludes that manipulating the genetics of nonhuman animals to engineer a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Jane Harris - 2003 - Feminist Theory 4 (2):229-231.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Lloyd Morgan, and the Rise and Fall of "Animal Psychology".Alan Costall - 1998 - Society and Animals 6 (1):13-29.
    Whereas Darwin insisted upon the continuity of human and nonhuman animals, more recent students of animal behavior have largely assumed discontinuity. Lloyd Morgan was a pivotal figure in this transformation. His "canon, " although intended to underpin a psychological approach to animals, has been persistently misunderstood to be a stark prohibition of anthropomorphic description. His extension to animals of the terms "behavior" and "trial-and-error, " previously restricted to human psychology, again largely unwittingly devalued their original meaning and widened the gulf (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Animal Bodies in the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Modelling Medicine.Lynda Birke - 2012 - Body and Society 18 (3-4):156-178.
    What role do nonhuman animals play in the construction of medical knowledge? Animal researchers typically claim that their use has been essential to progress – but just how have animals fitted into the development of biomedicine? In this article, I trace how nonhuman animals, and their body parts, have become incorporated into laboratory processes and places. They have long been designed to fit into scientific procedures – now increasingly so through genetic design. Animals and procedures are closely connected – animals (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Moralność naukowców eksperymentujących na zwierzętach.Andrzej Elżanowski - 2015 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 94 (2):287-299, 470-471.
    Aside from the local (mostly Western) efforts to subject animal experimentation to public scrutiny, the extent of animal experimentation, the acceptance of alternative methods and the fate of animals in laboratories depend on experimenters’ morality (as defined by social psychology), whose shaping is of crucial importance for the future of animal use in science. Meanwhile, sociological and ethnographic research in laboratories demonstrates that in the matter of animal use the experimenters are unreflective, ethically incompetent, and incapable of taking a critical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•