Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is “Race” Modern? Disambiguating the Question.Adam Hochman - 2020 - du Bois Review 1:1-19.
    Race theorists have been unable to reach a consensus regarding the basic historical question, “is ‘race’ modern?” I argue that this is partly because the question itself is ambiguous. There is not really one question that race scholars are answering, but at least six. First, is the concept of race modern? Second, is there a modern concept of race that is distinct from earlier race concepts? Third, are “races” themselves modern? Fourth, are racialized groups modern? Fifth, are the means and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Replacing Race: Interactive Constructionism About Racialized Groups.Adam Hochman - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4:61-92.
    In this paper I defend anti-realism about race and a new theory of racialization. I argue that there are no races, only racialized groups. Many social constructionists about race have adopted racial formation theory to explain how ‘races’ are formed. However, anti-realists about race cannot adopt racial formation theory, because it assumes the reality of race. I introduce interactive constructionism about racialized groups as a theory of racialization for anti-realists about race. Interactive constructionism moves the discussion away from the dichotomous (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Testing Boundaries: Jewish Conversion and Cultural Fluidity in Medieval Europe, C. 1200–1391.Paola Tartakoff - 2015 - Speculum 90 (3):728-762.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Flow of Blood in Medieval Norwich.Jeffrey J. Cohen - 2004 - Speculum 79 (1):26-65.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation