Citations of work:

Nicholas H. Steneck (1999). Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished?

5 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

  1.  1
    Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’.S. P. J. M. Horbach & W. Halffman - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1461-1485.
    Even though integrity is widely considered to be an essential aspect of research, there is an ongoing debate on what actually constitutes research integrity. The understanding of integrity ranges from the minimal, only considering falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to the maximum, blending into science ethics. Underneath these obvious contrasts, there are more subtle differences that are not as immediately evident. The debate about integrity is usually presented as a single, universal discussion, with shared concerns for researchers, policymakers and ‘the public’. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Social-Cognitive Barriers to Ethical Authorship.Jordan R. Schoenherr - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  50
    Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management.Erich W. Schienke, Seth D. Baum, Nancy Tuana Kenneth & J. Davis Klaus Keller - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):503-523.
    In this essay we develop and argue for the adoption of a more comprehensive model of research ethics than is included within current conceptions of responsible conduct of research (RCR). We argue that our model, which we label the ethical dimensions of scientific research (EDSR), is a more comprehensive approach to encouraging ethically responsible scientific research compared to the currently typically adopted approach in RCR training. This essay focuses on developing a pedagogical approach that enables scientists to better understand and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  75
    Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management.Erich Schienke, Seth Baum, Nancy Tuana, Kenneth Davis & Klaus Keller - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):503-523.
    In this essay we develop and argue for the adoption of a more comprehensive model of research ethics than is included within current conceptions of responsible conduct of research (RCR). We argue that our model, which we label the ethical dimensions of scientific research (EDSR), is a more comprehensive approach to encouraging ethically responsible scientific research compared to the currently typically adopted approach in RCR training. This essay focuses on developing a pedagogical approach that enables scientists to better understand and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  5.  13
    New Common Federal Definition of Research Misconduct in the United States.Stephanie J. Bird & Alicia K. Dustira - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):123-130.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation