Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. From Ponêêros to Pharmakos: Theater, Social Drama, and Revolution in Athens, 428-404 BCE.David Rosenbloom - 2002 - Classical Antiquity 21 (2):283-346.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The sobering up of Oedipus: Levinas and the trauma of responsibility.Cynthia D. Coe - 2013 - Angelaki 18 (4):5-21.
    Levinas's work persistently challenges the claim that the sovereignty of the ego is the foundation for ethics, a claim he attributes to the Greek philosophical tradition. This claim emerges in dominant accounts of responsibility, in which the agent's intentions define his or her culpability. However, in Oedipus Tyrannos Sophocles also attempts to undermine this strict pairing of responsibility and deliberate choice. Oedipus undergoes a fundamentally Levinasian narrative arc by moving from self-assured sovereignty, based on his ability to comprehend the world, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • La política en el secreto. Reflexiones contemporáneas a partir de Edipo Rey.Ricardo Laleff Ilieff - 2018 - Araucaria 20 (39).
    El presente artículo versa sobre la relación entre secreto y política a partir de una relectura de Edipo Rey, para lo cual se realizará también una reposición crítica de los aportes de Michel Foucault al respecto. Se argumenta que en dicha tragedia griega el secreto aparece en el origen mismo de lo político; cuestión que habilita a iniciar una reflexión contemporánea que escape de lo que ha sido la visión hegemonónica sobre el secreto, es decir, aquella que menta su dimensión (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral and Epistemic Ambiguity in Oedipus Rex.Havi Carel - 2006 - Janus Head 9 (1):91-109.
    This paper challenges the accepted interpretation of Oedipus Rex, which takes Oedipus’ ignorance of the relevant facts to be an established matter. I argue that Oedipus’ epistemic state is ambiguous, and that this in turn generates a moral ambiguity with respect to his actions. Because ignorance serves as a moral excuse, my demonstration that Oedipus was not ignorant bears significantly on the moral meaning of the play. I next propose to anchor this ambiguity in the Freudian notion of the unconscious, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation