Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. McDowell's Identity Conception of Truth: A Reply to Fish and MacDonald.Julian Dodd - 2008 - Analysis 68 (1):76–85.
  • Complexity Unfavoured.Alan Baker - 2008 - Analysis 68 (1):85–88.
  • Liberal Naturalism, Objectivity and the Autonomy of the Mental.David Zapero - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (5):546-564.
    ABSTRACTThe paper distinguishes between two different ways of cashing out the general insight that often goes by the name of ‘liberal naturalism’. The objective is to show how these two different argumentative strategies undergird two fundamentally different approaches to the project of elucidating the specificity of mental phenomena. On one approach, the central concern of such a project is the ontological status of subjective conscious phenomena; on the other, the central concern is the irreducibility of parochial capacities in the adoption (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sense and the Identity Conception of Truth.Steven J. Methven - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):1041-1056.
    The identity conception of truth holds that a thinkable is true just in case it is a fact. As such, it sets itself against correspondence theories of truth, while respecting the substantive role played by truth in respect of enquiry. In this article, I motivate and develop that view, and, in so doing, promote a particular conception of sense. This allows me to defend the view from two substantial criticisms. First, that the identity conception of truth is incoherent in respect (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • D. Z. Phillips and Wittgenstein's on Certainty.Guy Stock - 2007 - Philosophical Investigations 30 (3):285–318.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Unity of a Tractarian Fact.Colin Johnston - 2007 - Synthese 156 (2):231-251.
    It is not immediately clear from Wittgenstein’s Tractatus how to connect his idea there of an object with the logical ontologies of Frege and Russell. Toward clarification on this matter, this paper compares Russell’s and Wittgenstein’s versions of the thesis of an atomic fact that it is a complex composition. The claim arrived at is that whilst Russell (at times at least) has one particular of the elements of a fact – the relation – responsible for the unity of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations