Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Reflective Equilibrium? I: Reflexivity of Justification.Svein Eng - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (1):138-154.
    In A Theory of Justice (1971), John Rawls introduces the concept of “reflective equilibrium.” Although there are innumerable references to and discussions of this concept in the literature, there is, to the present author's knowledge, no discussion of the most important question: Why reflective equilibrium? In particular, the question arises: Is the method of reflective equilibrium applicable to the choice of this method itself? Rawls's drawing of parallels between Kant's moral theory and his own suggests that his concept of “reflective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Getting Real or Staying Positive: Legal Realism, Legal Positivism and the Prospects of Naturalism in Jurisprudence.Jakob V. H. Holtermann - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (4):535-555.
    The relationship between Legal Realism and Legal Positivism has been a recurrent source of debate. The question has been further complicated by the related difficulty of assessing the internal relationship between the two main original strands of Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian. This paper suggests considering American and Scandinavian Realism as instantiations of forward-looking and backward-looking rule skepticism respectively. This distinction brings into sharp relief not only the fundamentally different relationship between each of these two Realist schools and Legal Positivism (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation