Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-implications in BCI.Tomasz Kowalski - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (3):295-305.
    Humberstone asks whether every theorem of BCI provably implies $\phi\to\phi$ for some formula $\phi$. Meyer conjectures that the axiom $\mathbf{B}$ does not imply any such "self-implication." We prove a slightly stronger result, thereby confirming Meyer's conjecture.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An Abelian Rule for BCI—and Variations.Tomasz Kowalski & Lloyd Humberstone - 2016 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (4):551-568.
    We show the admissibility for BCI of a rule form of the characteristic implicational axiom of abelian logic, this rule taking us from →β to α. This is done in Section 8, with surrounding sections exploring the admissibility and derivability of various related rules in several extensions of BCI.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Integrally Closed Residuated Lattices.José Gil-Férez, Frederik Möllerström Lauridsen & George Metcalfe - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (5):1063-1086.
    A residuated lattice is said to be integrally closed if it satisfies the quasiequations \ and \, or equivalently, the equations \ and \. Every integral, cancellative, or divisible residuated lattice is integrally closed, and, conversely, every bounded integrally closed residuated lattice is integral. It is proved that the mapping \\backslash {\mathrm {e}}\) on any integrally closed residuated lattice is a homomorphism onto a lattice-ordered group. A Glivenko-style property is then established for varieties of integrally closed residuated lattices with respect (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Algebraizability of the Implicational Fragment of Abelian Logic.Sam Butchart & Susan Rogerson - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (5):981-1001.
    In this paper we consider the implicational fragment of Abelian logic \ . We show that although the Abelian groups provide an semantics for the set of theorems of \ they do not for the associated consequence relation. We then show that the consequence relation is not algebraizable in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi . In the second part of the paper, we investigate an extension of \ in the same language and having the same set of theorems and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations