- The deep ecology of rhetoric in Mencius and Aristotle: a somatic guide.Douglas Robinson - 2016 - Albany: SUNY Press.details
|
|
Being Made Strange: Rhetoric beyond Representation.Bradford Vivian - 2012 - SUNY Press.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.details
|
|
Project report: Split-up — a legal expert system which determines property division upon divorce. [REVIEW]John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri & Mark Gawler - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):267-275.details
|
|
Evaluating psychodiagnostic decisions.Cilia L. M. Witteman, Clare Harries, Hilary L. Bekker & Edward J. M. Van Aarle - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (1):10-15.details
|
|
Learning how to learn: A critique.Christopher Winch - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):649-665.details
|
|
Developing critical rationality as a pedagogical aim.Christopher Winch - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):467–484.details
|
|
Ability, intelligence and practical education.Christopher Winch - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 22 (1):35–45.details
|
|
How Uncertain Do We Need to Be?Jon Williamson - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (6):1249-1271.details
|
|
Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. [REVIEW]William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.details
|
|
More models just means more difficulty.N. E. Wetherick - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):367-368.details
|
|
Reason and refutation: a review of two recent books by Harvey Siegel. [REVIEW]Mark Weinstein - 1992 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 11 (3):231-263.details
|
|
Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con.Carol H. Weiss - 1991 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 4 (1):37-55.details
|
|
Argumentation: The Mixed Game. [REVIEW]Edda Weigand - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (1):59-87.details
|
|
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.details
|
|
Varieties of modal (classificatory) and comparative probability.Peter Walley & Terrence L. Fine - 1979 - Synthese 41 (3):321 - 374.details
|
|
Structures of Logic in Policy and Theory: Identifying Sub-systemic Bricks for Investigating, Building, and Understanding Conceptual Systems.Steven E. Wallis - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (3):213-231.details
|
|
Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Synthese 152 (2):237-284.details
|
|
Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):85-113.details
|
|
Building a System for Finding Objections to an Argument.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):369-391.details
|
|
Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems.James F. Voss - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):321-329.details
|
|
On the processing of arguments.James F. Voss, Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer, Jennifer Wiley & Laurie Ney Silfies - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (2):165-181.details
|
|
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):347-371.details
|
|
Charles Sanders Peirce, A Mastermind of (Legal) Arguments.Vadim Verenich - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):31-55.details
|
|
The logic of empirical theories revisited.Johan van Benthem - 2012 - Synthese 186 (3):775-792.details
|
|
The ethics of belief and two conceptions of christian faith.Van A. Harvey - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1):39-54.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):1-23.details
|
|
David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.details
|
|
The complex, the exhausted and the personal: reflections on the relationship between evidence-based medicine and casuistry. Commentary on Tonelli (2006), Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of.Ross E. G. Upshur - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):281-288.details
|
|
An object model for use in oral and written advocacy.Charles Unwin - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):389-402.details
|
|
Scientific thinking and mental models.Ryan D. Tweney - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):366-367.details
|
|
Text retrieval in the legal world.Howard Turtle - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):5-54.details
|
|
Ordinary People can Reason: A Rhetorical Case for Including Vernacular Voices in Ethical Public Relations Practice.Calvin L. Troup - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):441-453.details
|
|
Public Voices in Pharmaceutical Deliberations: Negotiating “Clinical Benefit” in the FDA’s Avastin Hearing.Christa B. Teston, S. Scott Graham, Raquel Baldwinson, Andria Li & Jessamyn Swift - 2014 - Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (2):149-170.details
|
|
Situation theory and mental models.Alice G. B. ter Meulen - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):358-359.details
|
|
The diversity of modes of discourse and the development of sociological knowledge.Nico Stehr & Anthony Simmons - 1979 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10 (1):141-161.details
|
|
Nonsentential representation and nonformality.Keith Stenning & Jon Oberlander - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):365-366.details
|
|
Models, rules and expertise.Rosemary J. Stevenson - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):366-366.details
|
|
Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.details
|
|
Argumentation in School Science: Breaking the Tradition of Authoritative Exposition Through a Pedagogy that Promotes Discussion and Reasoning. [REVIEW]Shirley Simon & Katherine Richardson - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (4):469-493.details
|
|
A hermeneutic account of clinical psychology: Strengths and limits.Louise E. Silvern - 1990 - Philosophical Psychology 3 (1):5-27.details
|
|
The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived.J. E. Sigler - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (3):325-349.details
|
|
The generalizability of critical thinking.Harvey Siegel - 1991 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 23 (1):18–30.details
|
|
?That's not fair!? argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication.Margrit Schreier, Norbert Groeben & Ursula Christmann - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):267-289.details
|
|
Unjustified presuppositions of competence.Leah Savion - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):364-365.details
|
|
A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.details
|
|
An alternative logical framework for dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences.Ru Michael Sabre - 1991 - Theory and Decision 30 (3):187-211.details
|
|
Purpose, Argument Fields, and Theoretical Justification.Robert C. Rowland - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):235-250.details
|
|
Philosophy in schools.George MacDonald Ross - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 22 (2):207–219.details
|
|