- Nothing Persuades Like Success: Reflections on Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion. A Reply to Debowska-Kozlowska: Comment to: Processing Topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion Dialogues.Fabio Paglieri - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):341-348.details
|
|
From interpretation to consent: Arguments, beliefs and meaning.Steve Oswald - 2011 - Discourse Studies 13 (6):806-814.details
|
|
How did you change my view? A corpus-based study of concessions’ argumentative role.Elena Musi - 2018 - Discourse Studies 20 (2):270-288.details
|
|
Evidently epistential adverbs are argumentative indicators: A corpus-based study.Elena Musi & Andrea Rocci - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (2):175-192.details
|
|
Evidential Modals at the Semantic-Argumentative Interface: Appearance Verbs as Indicators of Defeasible Argumentation.Elena Musi - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (4):417-442.details
|
|
A Disability Bioethics Reading of the FDA and EMA Evaluations on the Marketing Authorisation of Growth Hormone for Idiopathic Short Stature Children.Maria Cristina Murano - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (3):266-282.details
|
|
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies.Andrei Moldovan - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (2):287-303.details
|
|
Institutional Insights for Analysing Strategic Manoeuvring in the British Prime Minister’s Question Time.Dima Mohammed - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):377-393.details
|
|
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Emotions as Objects of Argumentative Constructions.Raphaël Micheli - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (1):1-17.details
|
|
Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation.Raphaël Micheli - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.details
|
|
Looking for Arguments.Hugo Mercier - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):305-324.details
|
|
Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse: Justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion.Chiara Mercuri, Chiara Pollaroli, Rebecca Schär & Sara Greco - 2018 - Discourse Studies 20 (6):726-742.details
|
|
The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation.Davide Mazzi - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (3):1233-1252.details
|
|
Introduction.Dario Martinelli - 2009 - Sign Systems Studies 37 (3/4):353-368.details
|
|
El Análisis Crítico del Discurso y el giro decolonial ¿Por qué y para qué?Francesco Maniglio & Rosimeire Barboza da Silva - 2021 - Critical Discourse Studies 18 (1):156-184.details
|
|
Reconstructing Metaphorical Meaning.Fabrizio Macagno & Benedetta Zavatta - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):453-488.details
|
|
Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):519-547.details
|
|
Classifying the patterns of natural arguments.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1): 26-53.details
|
|
The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting.Christoph Lumer - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):51-82.details
|
|
John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal.Mark Garrett Longaker - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (4):364-392.details
|
|
The Paradox of Charity.Marcin Lewiński - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (4):403-439.details
|
|
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues.Marcin Lewinski - 2021 - Informal Logic 42 (4):421-451.details
|
|
Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren : Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham , Springer , 880 pp. [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):527-532.details
|
|
On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion.Fernando Leal - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):405-431.details
|
|
How to think about informal proofs.Brendan Larvor - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):715-730.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. [REVIEW]Nanon Labrie - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):171-199.details
|
|
Quantifying Doctors’ Argumentation in General Practice Consultation Through Content Analysis: Measurement Development and Preliminary Results.Nanon Labrie & Peter J. Schulz - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):33-55.details
|
|
Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition.Guenther Kreuzbauer - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):71-85.details
|
|
Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.details
|
|
The Formalization of Critical Discussion.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):101-119.details
|
|
About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):27-58.details
|
|
Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege.Ben Kotzee - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):265-281.details
|
|
The Lvov–Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory.Marcin Koszowy & Michał Araszkiewicz - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):283-300.details
|
|
Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):179-196.details
|
|
Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):91-108.details
|
|
Houtlosser and van Rees (Eds.) - Considering pragmadialectics: A festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday.Christian Kock - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):221-227.details
|
|
Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate.Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (3):223-247.details
|
|
A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting.Fred J. Kauffeld & Beth Innocenti - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):463-483.details
|
|
Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies.Magdalena Kacprzak & Olena Yaskorska - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):349-369.details
|
|
Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation.André Juthe - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (3):413-454.details
|
|
A core ontology for requirements.Ivan J. Jureta, John Mylopoulos & Stéphane Faulkner - 2009 - Applied ontology 4 (3):169-244.details
|
|
How to identify and evaluate the Slippery Slope Argument.Martina Juříková - 2015 - Pro-Fil 16 (1):44.details
|
|
“You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device.Henrike Jansen - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (4):615-640.details
|
|
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions.Beth Innocenti - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):345-364.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.David Hitchcock - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (1):94-123.details
|
|
Advances in Pragma-Dialectics.David Hitchcock - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (1).details
|
|
Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):41-58.details
|
|
The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach.Adam J. L. Harris, Ulrike Hahn, Jens K. Madsen & Anne S. Hsu - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):1496-1533.details
|
|
Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.details
|
|