Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Information Relevance in Pseudodiagnostic Reasoning.Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau & Gaelle Villejoubert - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  • Whither the Alternatives: Determinants and Consequences of Selective Versus Comparative Judgemental Processing.David M. Sanbonmatsu, Sam Vanous, Christine Hook, Steven S. Posavac & Frank R. Kardes - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):367 - 386.
    Judgements of the value or likelihood of a focal object or outcome have been shown to vary dramatically as a function of whether judgement is based on selective or comparative processing. This article explores the question of when selective versus comparative processing is likely, and demonstrates that as motivation and opportunity to process information carefully (operationalised as accountability and time pressure, respectively) decrease, the likelihood of selective processing increases. Moreover, we document how individuals manage to render judgements when in selective (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation