Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Causal Conditional Reasoning and Conditional Likelihood.Philip M. Fernbach & Adam Darlow - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 1088--1093.
  • The Processes of Inference.Sangeet Khemlani & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (1):4 - 20.
    (2013). The processes of inference. Argument & Computation: Vol. 4, Formal Models of Reasoning in Cognitive Psychology, pp. 4-20. doi: 10.1080/19462166.2012.674060.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Double-Process Theories: A Unified Cognitive Architecture?Mariela Destefano & Fernanda Velázquez Coccia - 2018 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 33 (1).
    It has been distinguished between unified cognitive architecture and multiple-process architecture. Based on this distinction, we will try to show that if processes coordination criteria are explicated and analyzed, double-process theories for reasoning and decision making have difficulties to consolidate as multiple process architecture.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Models Redux: Response to Evans and Over.Ruth M. J. Byrne & Philip N. Johnson-Laird - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (1):6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Logic, Models, and Paradoxical Inferences.Isabel Orenes & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (4):357-377.
    People reject ‘paradoxical’ inferences, such as: Luisa didn't play music; therefore, if Luisa played soccer, then she didn't play music. For some theorists, they are invalid for everyday conditionals, but valid in logic. The theory of mental models implies that they are valid, but unacceptable because the conclusion refers to a possibility inconsistent with the premise. Hence, individuals should accept them if the conclusions refer only to possibilities consistent with the premises: Luisa didn't play soccer; therefore, if Luisa played a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations