Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Models of Memory: Wittgenstein and Cognitive Science.David G. Stern - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):203-18.
  • Sources of the Remarks in Wittgenstein'sphilosophical Investigations.André Maury - 1994 - Synthese 98 (3):349 - 378.
  • “Good” Philosophical Reasons for “Bad” Editorial Philology? On Rhees and Wittgenstein'sPhilosophical Grammar.Christian Erbacher - 2019 - Philosophical Investigations 42 (2):111-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • “Among the Omitted Stuff, There Are Many Good Remarks of a General Nature” – On the Making of von Wright and Wittgenstein’s Culture and Value.Christian Erbacher - 2017 - SATS 18 (2):79-113.
    This paper uses archival material to contextualize Georg Henrik von Wright’s making of Vermischte Bemerkungen, an edition that assembles Wittgenstein’s remarks on cultural topics. Von Wright was particularly interested in these remarks but initially regarded them as too detached from philosophy to be published. In 1967-68, however, he began seeing socio-political questions as belonging to philosophy. He then resumed editing Wittgenstein’s ‘general remarks’ and published them in 1977. Von Wright did not read Culture and Value as a philosophical work, but (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Review Article: The Bergen Electronic Edition of Wittgenstein's Nachlass.David Stern - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):455-467.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Editorial Approaches to Wittgenstein's Nachlass: Towards a Historical Appreciation.Christian Erbacher - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (3):165-198.
    Building on the unpublished correspondence between Ludwig Wittgenstein's literary executors Rush Rhees, Elizabeth Anscombe and Georg Henrik von Wright, this paper sketches the historical development of different editorial approaches to Wittgenstein's Nachlass. Using the metaphor of a ladder, it is possible to distinguish seven significant “rungs” or “steps” in the history of editing Wittgenstein's writings. The paper focuses particularly on the first four rungs, elucidating how Rhees, Anscombe and von Wright developed different editorial approaches that resulted in significant differences in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations