Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
    In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion. Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed that identifying and acknowledging (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  • Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies.Harvey Siegel & John Biro - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):277-292.
    In Biro and Siegel we argued that a theory of argumentation mustfully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developedsuch a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):263-282.
    I begin by formulating the problem of the nature of fallacy in terms of the logic of the negative evaluation of argument, that is, in terms of a theory of logical criticism; here I discuss several features of my approach and several advantages vis-à-vis other approaches; a main feature of my approach is the concern to avoid both formalist and empiricist excesses. I then define six types of fallaciousness, labeled formal, explanatory, presuppositional, positive, semantical, and persuasive; they all involve arguments (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • The normative structure of case study argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1993 - Metaphilosophy 24 (3):207-226.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Very Idea of Epistemology.Donald McCloskey - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (1):1.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.
    Douglas Walton’s multitudinous contributions to the study of argumentation seldom, if ever, directly engage with argumentation in mathematics. Nonetheless, several of the innovations with which he is most closely associated lend themselves to improving our understanding of mathematical arguments. I concentrate on two such innovations: dialogue types (§1) and argumentation schemes (§2). I argue that both devices are much more applicable to mathematical reasoning than may be commonly supposed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Does an appeal to tradition rest on mistaken reasoning?Jim Gough - unknown
    Various logic texts offer explanations of a fallacy identified as an appeal to tradition. The identification of this fallacy should be scrutinized for any faulty reasoning. Whether this fallacy is committed depends on the kind of relation asserted be tween the present and the past. An understanding of its relations clarifies when an appeal to tradition could be fallacious. This is illustrated by the views of Socrates, Bentham, Scruton, and others. I argue tradition transfers something from the past to the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Commentary on Blair.Maurice Finocchiaro - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•