Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?François Jaquet - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (3):447-458.
    Oscar Horta has argued that speciesism is wrong by definition. In his view, there can be no more substantive debate about the justification of speciesism than there can be about the legality of murder, for it stems from the definition of “speciesism” that speciesism is unjustified just as it stems from the definition of “murder” that murder is illegal. The present paper is a case against this conception. I distinguish two issues: one is descriptive and the other normative. Relying on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Speciesism Revisited.Evelyn Pluhar - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (4):6.
  • My Kind of Person.Michael Wreen - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (1):9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Article Review of In Defense of Speciesism, Ethics & Animals.Evelyn B. Pluhar - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Adventures in Moral Consistency: How to Develop an Abortion Ethic Through an Animal Rights Framework.Cheryl E. Abbate - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):145-164.
    In recent discussions, it has been argued that a theory of animal rights is at odds with a liberal abortion policy. In response, Francione (1995) argues that the principles used in the animal rights discourse do not have implications for the abortion debate. I challenge Francione’s conclusion by illustrating that his own framework of animal rights, supplemented by a relational account of moral obligation, can address the moral issue of abortion. I first demonstrate that Francione’s animal rights position, which grounds (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Core Argument for Veganism.Stijn Bruers - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):271-290.
    This article presents an argument for veganism, using a formal-axiomatic approach: a list of twenty axioms are explicitly stated. These axioms are all necessary conditions to derive the conclusion that veganism is a moral duty. The presented argument is a minimalist or core argument for veganism, because it is as parsimonious as possible, using the weakest conditions, the narrowest definitions, the most reliable empirical facts and the minimal assumptions necessary to reach the conclusion. If someone does not accept the conclusion, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations