Abstract
The United States Government does not mandate that US based firms follow US social and environmental law in foreign markets. However, because many developing countries do not have strong human rights, labor, and environmental laws, many multinationals have adopted voluntary corporate responsibility initiatives to self-regulate their overseas social and environmental practices. This article argues that voluntary actions, while important, are insufficient to address the magnitude of problems companies confront as they operate in developing countries where governance is often inadequate. The United States can do more to ensure that its multinationals act responsibly everywhere they operate. First, policymakers should define the social and environmental responsibilities of global companies. They must consistently make their expectations for global business clear – and underscore that this objective can often be accomplished without mandates. Second, the US should closely examine the policies that undermine global Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and address the many conflicting signals sent by policymakers. Third, the President should make the US government a CSR model by examining how to use its purchasing power to promote human rights. Finally, the US government should require pension funds to report on the social and environmental consequences of their investments. In these ways, Americans can mind our business – and thus make sure that US based firms do not undermine social and environmental progress when they operate in the developing world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S.A. Aaronson J. Reeves (2002) Corporate Responsibility in the Global Village: The Role of Public Policy NPA Washington
A. Aaronson S. (2003) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Responsibility in the Global Village: The British Role Model and the American Laggard’ Business and Society Review 108 IssueID3 309–338
Aaronson, S. A.: 2003, ‘Courting International Business’, International Economy (Spring), pp. 63–65.
S.A. Aaronson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Global Corporate Social Responsibility Pressures and the Failure to Develop Universal Rules to Govern Investors and States’ Journal of World Investment 3 IssueID3 487–506
Aaronson, S. A.: 2004, ‘International Investment Carousel: When it comes to Rules for International Investment, it’s time to Stop Riding the WTO’, International Economy,(Winter), 63–65.
AFL-CIO (American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations): 2004, www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/bushwatch/2005budget.cfm#ilab
AFL-CIO: March 16, 2004: www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/globaleconomy/china_petition.cfm
Aldonas, G. D.: May 22, 2003, ‘Testimony at the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies’, in Brower M. and W. Leon: 1999, ‘The Consumers’ Guide to Effective Environmental Choices, Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists’, (Three Rivers, New York).
BSR (Business for Social Responsibility) at www.bsr.org/CSRResources/IssueBriefDetail.cfm?DocumentID=48809.
Business-Human Rights.Org: (2004) at www.business-humanrights.org
California Corporate Accountability Project: 2002, at www.nautilus.org/cap/reports/CAPhandbook.pdf
Castro, I: June12, 2002: ‘Out of Work Nicaraguan Coffee Workers Beg for Help.
Corn: July 15, 2004, ‘Corporate Human Rights’, The Nation, at www.laborrights.org/press/nation071502.htm
L.W. Craner (2002) ‘Surrey Memorial Lecture’ National Policy Association Washington, D.C
K.A. Eliott R.B. Freeman (2003) Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization Institute for International Economics Washington, D.C.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): 2004, www. epa.gov/partners/index.htm; and www.epa.gov/partners/programs/index.htm#global
EPA:2003a. www.epa.gov/international/regions/index.html
EPA: 2003b www.epa.gov/international/trade/geninfo .html
European Commission: 2004, europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/sipade2.pdf (survey of EU Member States CSR initiatives).
European Commssion: April 14, 2003, ‘European Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Corporate Social Responsibility’, Roundtable on the Development Aspects of CSR, at www.euopea.eu.int/comm/trade/csr/index_en.htm
Evans, D.: July 9, 2003, at www.commerce.gov/opa/speeches/Evans/2003/July_09_Evans_ClevelandCityClub.thm
Evans, D.: October 28, 2003, at www.commerce.gov/opa/speeches/Evans/2003/Oct_28_Evans_AmChamChina.htm
Ex-Im (Export Import Bank: 2003), www.exim;gov;www.eim.gov/envproc.html
Fair Labor Organization: 2004, www.fla.org
Frundt, H.: 1999, ‘Cross-Border Organizing in the Apparel Industry: Lessons From Central America and the Caribbean?’, www.usleap.org/trade/FrundtArticle.html
Global Pesticide Campaigner: June 1998, ‘Exporting Risk: Pesticide Exports from US Ports’, Vol. 8, no. 2.
Global Policy.Org: 2002, www.globalpolicy.org/reform/business/2002/bizstandard.htm
Global Reporting Initiative: 2004, at www.globalreporting.org
Goldman, A.: November 28, 2004 ‘Mattel struggles to balance profit with morality’, Los Angeles Times, reprinted in Seattle Times http://seattletimes.nwsource .com/html/nationworld/2002102845_toys28.html
Gorte, J.: June 27, 2002, ‘Corporate Ethics, Good Management’, speech, at www.calvert.com/invwcal_newsArticle.asp?article+1525&image=cnjpg.
Government Accountability Office: June 2001a, ‘Comparison of US and European Union’
Preference Programs, June 2001, GAO-01-647, 5.
Government Accountability Office: June 2001b, ‘Federal Procurement, Better Guidance and Monitoring Needed to Assess Purchases of Environmentally Friendly Products’, GAO-01-430, 1–3.
Government Accountability Office: January 2002, ‘Defense Management: Industry Practices Can Help Military Exchange Bases better Assure that their Goods are not Made by Child or Forced Labor’, GAO-02-256, 2–5.
Government Accountability Office: August: 2002, ‘Significant Challenges Remain in Deterring Trade in Conflict Diamonds’, (Washington: GAO), GAO-02-678. http://www.diamonds.net/kp/US20General20Accounting 20Office20Report.pdf
Government Accountability Office: November 2004, ‘Environmental Indicators: Better Coordination is Needed to Develop Environmental Indicator Sets that Inform Decisions’, GAO-05-52.
Graham, E.: 2000, Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Antiglobal Activists and Multinational Enterprises (IIE, Washington), pp. 9–10.
Griffin, M.: April, 2004, ‘European Cotton Subsidies: Meeting the Doha Challenge?’ Bridges 4(4) 7–10 at www.icstd.org
Human Rights Watch: 2004a, ‘CAFTA’s Weak Labor Rights Protections: Why the Present Accord Should be Opposed’, www.hrw.org/english/docs/2004/03/09/usint8099.htm
Human Rights Watch: 2004b, www.hrw.org/english/docs/2004/02/04/usint7268_txt.htm
International Labor Rights Fund: 2004, http://www.laborrights.org/projects/linklabor/GSP20Guatemala 2012-04.pdf.
http://www.laborrights.org/projects/linklabor/GSP_CentralAm_1204.htm
International Finance Corporation (IFC): 2004, ‘Safeguard Policies to Performance Standards: A briefing Note on IFC’s Update of the Safeguard Policies and Opportunities for Client and Stakeholder Engagement’, 1–5.
International Organization of Employers and International Chamber of Commerce: 2004, ‘Joint Views on the UN Draft Norms...’ http://209.238.219.111/IOE-ICC-views-UN-norms-March-2004.doc.
Interview with H. Goldschmidt, SEC Commissioner: January 5, 2004.
Interview with J. Gorte, Director of Social Research, Calvert: August 10, 2002.
Kass, S. L. and J. M. McCarroll: August 27, 2004, ‘After Sosa: Claims Under the Alien Tort Claims Act-Part I’, New York Law Journal, at www.clm.com/pubs/pub-1259528.html.
Kenan Institute Working Group on CSR and China: 2004, Statement of Findings, Promoting CSR in China’, September 2004, www.csrpolicies.org.
Koh, H. H.: July 18, 2003, ‘Wrong on Rights’, Yaleglobal, at yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=2121
Library of Congress: 2004, S1413, Thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query.
Library of Congress: 2000, HR 4596, Thomas. Thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d106:2./temp/∼bdK30^::l/bss/d106query.htmll
Lindblad, K. et al.: July 15, 2002, ‘The 1000: The World’s Most Valuable Corporations’, Business Week, 58–59.
Maitland, A.: December 9, 2004, ‘A Widening Sphere of Influence’, Financial Times.
Millennium Challenge Corporation: 2004, http://www.mca.gov/countries/selection/data.shtml/
National Security Archive, documents on Chile, (November 2000) at /www2.gwu.edu/∼nsarchiv/news/20001113/700909.pdf
NA: 2004, ‘Alien Tort Claims Act’, http://cyber.law. harvard.edu/torts3y/readings/update-a-02.html
NA: 2004, write.news.findlaw.com/sebok/20040322.html
NGO Working Group on EDC: July 2004, ‘Responsibility and Human Rights: Taking a Rights-basd Approach to Trade and Project Finance’, 1.
OECD. (2001) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals’ OECD Paris 31–45
OECD: 2004, www.oecd.org/department
OPIC (Overseas Private Investment Corporation:1999), www.opic.gov/Publications/envbookhtm
OPIC: March, 2002, ‘001 Annual Environmental Report’, March, 2002, www.opic.gov/Publications/2001AnnEnvRep.htm, 8
OPIC: 2003, ‘Forging New Partnerships, Annual Report’, www.opic.gov/pdf/publications03_AnnualReport.pdf
Oxfam International: 2002, ‘Rigged Rules and Double Standards: Trade, Globalization, and the Fight Against Poverty’, (Oxfam, Oxford, England), pp. 3, 247, also at www.maketradefair.org.
Oxfam America: 2003, ‘Fair Trade Coffee: Changing the world One Cup at a Time’, www.oxamerica.org/fairtrade.
Perlez, Jane, ‘Mining Giant Told It Put Toxic Vapors Into Indonesia’s Air’, New York Times 1, 12.
Pesticide Action Network, www.ban.org/www/panna.org/resources/pestis/PESTIS.burst.22.html
Powell, C.: October 15 2003, ‘Remarks at Corporate Excellence Awards’, Department of State.
Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC:2004, www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml
Sutherland, D.: February 18, 2002, ‘Public Companies Tweak Accounting to Hide Environmental Debt’, Environmental News Service.
Transfair: 2004, at www.transfairusa.org
United Kingdom: 2002, Annual Report on CSR, www.societyandbusiness.gov.uk/2002/report/index.html.
United Nations:2003, Security Council resolution 1499, at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2003/sc7841.doc.thm.
UNCTAD: (United Nations Commission on Trade and Development) 2004, ‘Global Investment Prospects Assessment’, at www.unctad.org
UNCTAD: 2004, ‘Prospects for FDI Flows, Transnational Corporation Strategies and Promotion Policies: 2004-2007 Results of a Survey of Location Experts’, at www.unctad.org
United Nations Commission on Human Rights: 2004, at www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm
USA Engage: 2003, www.usaengage.org/legislative/2003/alientort/alientorttpcases.html
USAID (US Agency for International Development): 2003, at www.usaid.gov/gda www.usaid.gov/gda/successfulpartnerships.htm www.usaid.gov/gda/threesector.htm.
USAID: 2004, ‘Congressional Aid Justification, 2005’, at /www.usaid.gov/policy/budget/cbj2005/summary.html
US Code: 1978, 15 amended in 1998, at www.usaid.gov/democracy/anticorruption/usaidprogs.html
US Congress, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: 1977, at www.usdoj.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa.html
US Congress: 1975, Public Law 93-618.
US Council for International Business: December 2003, at http://www.enewsbuilder.net/uscib_news/e_article000206286.cfm
US Customs: 2004, Department of Homeland Security, at www.customs.gov/imagecache/cfov/content/import/commercial_5fenforcement/rough_5fdiamonds_ 2edoc/v1/rough_5diamonds.doc.
US Department of Agriculture: 2002, www.usda.gov/news/releases/2002/07/0312.htm
US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Affairs, BEA News, 2004, ‘Summary Estimates for Multinational Companies: Employment, Sales and Capital expenditures for 2002’, (BEA 04-16) at www.bea.gov
US Department of Commerce: 1999, ‘Addressing the Challenges of International Bribery and Fair Competition’, at www.mac.doc.gov/tcc/anti_b/oecd1999/execsumx.pdf
US Department of Labor: 2002, www.dol.gov/opa/aboutdol/lawsprog.htm www.dol.gov/ilab
US Department of State: December 19, 2000, ‘Statement by the Governments of the United States of America and the United Kingdom’, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, at www.state.gov/wwww/global/human_rights/001220_fsdrl_principles.html
US Department of State, Economic Bureau: 2002, state.gov/e/eb/oecd/rel; state.gov;e/eb/oecd/book;.gov /e/eb/oecd/rel; state.gov;e/eb/oecd/bkgd
US Department of State: 2004, ‘Partnership to Eliminate Sweatshops Program’, /www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/34277 .htm
US Department of State, DRL: 2002, www.state.gov/g/drl/lbr.
US Department of State: August 2002, ‘Working for Sustainable World: US Government Initiatives to Promote Sustainable Development’, 3, at www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/18105.htm
US Department of State:2003, www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/18105.htm.
United States Supreme Court: 2004, www.supremecourtus.gov/qp/03-00339qp.pdf
United States Trade Representative: 2001, ‘Annual Report and Trade Policy Agenda 2001’, 14, at www.ustr.gov.
United States Trade Representative: 2002, ‘Annual Report and Trade Policy Agenda, 2002’, 9, at www.ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Reports_Pu blications/2002/2002_Trade_Policy_Agenda/asset_upload_file272_6253.pdf.
Press Release: 2002, at http://www.ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2002/January/U.S.-Cambodian_Textile_Agreement_Links_Increasing_Trade_with_Improving_Workers’_Rights.html
United States Trade Representative: September 2003, ‘U.S. Contributions to Trade Capacity Building: Improving Lives Through Trade and Aid’, at www.ustr.gov and data base at esdb.cdie.org/cgi-bin/broker.exe?_service=default&_program=tcbprogs.act_ cat_1.sas
USTR: 2004, ‘Bilateral Trade Agreements’, ww.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Section_Index.html
Williams, F.: May 28, 2004, ‘Fresh Development Policies Needed to Cut World Poverty’, FinancialTimes, 8.
Wirthlin Report.: 2004, ‘Social Responsibility: Key to Building Reputation and Regaining Trust’, 13, No. 2, (April: 2004), pp.1–8.
World Trade Organization: April 16, 2002, ‘Communication from the european Community and Its Member States’, WT/WGTI/W/115.
World Trade Organization (WTO): 2004, ‘Understanding the WTO’, (WTO, Geneva), p. 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Susan Aaronson is Senior Fellow and Director of Globalization Studies at the Kenan Institute Washington Center, an arm of the Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Her scholarly research focuses on international investment and social responsibility issues. Aaronson devised and directed a study, funded by the Ford, UN and Levi Strauss Foundations, that examined how U.S. public policies can promote or undermine global corporate social responsibility. She is now beginning a Levi-Strauss funded project on trade and human rights. Aaronson is a frequent speaker on public understanding of globalization issues and the author of four books on globalization including, Taking Trade to the Streets: The Lost History of Public Efforts to Shape Globalization (Michigan: 2001).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aaronson, S.A. “Minding Our Business”: What the United States Government has done and can do to Ensure that U.S. Multinationals Act Responsibly in Foreign Markets. J Bus Ethics 59, 175–198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3414-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3414-z