Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the distinction between niche and competitive ability: Implications for coexistence theory

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meaning of ‘niche’ and ‘competitive ability’ have long been surrounded by controversy. The reason for this stems from the obscure relationship that exists between these terms. This extends from the views of Darwin through Eltonian tradition to current views in which the meaning of competitive ability is implicitly infused into the paradigm of niche. Distinct operational definitions for niche and competitive ability are therefore established with special reference to plants. It is proposed that potential ‘niche’ refer explicitly to a theoretical hyperspace of ‘places’ where a species would leave descendents if all biotic interactions were precluded, and that competitive ability refer to the relative capacity to leave descendents in a particular ‘place’ in the face of restrictions imposed by competitive interaction. This leads to a qualitative comprehensive theory for coexistence which may be extended to any type of biotic interaction. Niche and competitive ability are both determined by the biological attributes of a species and may be independently adjusted in a population by natural selection in contexts of competition. Species coexistence in nature may therefore be a consequence of alternative evolutionary mechanisms which may operate to various degrees in concert: (1) natural selection leading to niche differentiation; (2) an ongoing process of reciprocal selection (coevolution) which maintains an approximate balance in relative competitive abilities for contested resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen, L.W. (1983). Ecological combining ability and competitive combining ability in plants: Towards a general evolutionary theory of coexistence in systems of competition. - Amer. Natur. 122: 707–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alley, T.R. (1982). Competition theory, evolution, and the concept of an ecological niche. - Acta biotheor. 31: 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics, J. (1978). The population genetics of mixtures. In J.R. Wilson (Ed.). Plant relations in pastures, 233–252. - East Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. (1982). Use of a relative physiological performance value in the prediction of performance in multispecies mixtures from monoculture performance. - J. Ecol. 70: 559–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bann Hofman, T., and Ennik, G.C. (1982). The effect of root mass of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) on the competitive ability with respect to couchgrass (Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv.). - Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 30: 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea, J.M. and Azcon-Aguilar, C. (1983). Mycorrhizas and their significance in nodulating nitrogen-fixing plants. - Adv. Agron. 36: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendse, F. (1981). Competition and equilibrium in grassland communities. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, Grassland Research Group Publications No. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, J.B. van den (1968). An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands. - Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. 714: 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, J.B. van den and Braakhekke, W.G. (1978). Coexistence of plant species by niche differentiation. In A.H.J. Freysen and J.W. Woldendorp (Eds.), Structure and functioning in plant populations, 125–138. - Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, L.C. (1957). The meaning of competition. - Amer. Natur. 41: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J.N. (1958). Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subteraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate. - Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9: 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J.N. (1960). The significance of petiole length, leaf area, and light interception in competition between strains of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) grown in swards. - Aust. J. Agric. Res. 11: 177–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, J.J. and Chilvers, G.A. (1977). The effect of barley mildew on balrey and wheat competition in mixtures. - Aust. J Bot. 25: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, T.J. and Gilpin, M.E. (1974). Interference competition and niche theory. - Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71: 3073–3077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P.A. (1982). Towards a theory of history: Fitness, niche and clutch in Homo sapiens L. - The fourth Tansley lecture. J. Ecol. 70: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. (1975). Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: A model and evidence from field experiments. In M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond (Eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, 460–490. - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crush, J.R. (1974). Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. VII. Growth and nodulation of some herbage legumes. - New Phytologist 73: 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. 6th edn. Everyman's Library (1928). Dent, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.W., and Morton, S.R. (1981). Competition for dispersal in ant-dispersed plants. - Science 213: 1259–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1978). Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. - Am. Sci. 66: 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C.M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. - Adv. Agron. 15: 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C.M., and Hamblin, J. (1983). The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. - Adv. Agron. 36: 97–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. (1927). Animal ecology. - London: Sedgewick & Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E. (1974). Intrinsic rate of increase, saturation density and competitive ability. 11. The evolution of competitive ability. - Amer. Natur. 108: 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givinish, T. (1979). On the adaptive significance of leaf form. In O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson and P.H. Raven (Eds.), Topics in plant population biology, 375–407. - N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W. (1972). The relict element of the flora of Crete and its evolutionary significance. In D.H. Valentine (Ed.), Taxonomy, phytogeography and evolution, 161–177. - London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. (1973). Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. - Nature 242: 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. (1979). Plant strategies and vegetation processes. - New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, J.W. (1980). Two metaphors of the niche. - Synthese 43: 123–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, P.J. (1977). The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. - Biol. Rev 52: 107–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N.G. (1983). Alpha selection in competing salamanders: Experimental verification of an a priori hypothesis. - Am. Nat. 122: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.L. (1974). Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. I. Concepts and extension of the de Wit analysis to examine effects. - Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25: 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. (1961). Approaches to the study of plant competition. In F.L. Milthorpe (Ed.), Mechanisms in biological competition. - Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 15: l–39.

  • Harper, J.L. (1964). The nature and consequence of interference amongst plants. In Genetics today. Proc. XI. - Int. Cong. Genetics 2: 465–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. (1965). Establishment, aggression and cohabitation in weedy species. In H.G. Baker and G.L. Stebbins (Eds.), The genetics of colonizing species, 243–265. - New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. (1968). The regulation of numbers and mass in plant populations. In R.C. Lewontin (Ed.), Population biology and evolution, 139–158. - Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. (1977). Population biology of plants. - London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. (1978). Response to J.P. Grime: Interpretation of small-scale patterns in the distribution of plant species in space and time, p. 122. In A.H.J. Freysen and J.W. Woldendorp (Eds.), Structure and functioning of plant populations. - Amsterdam: NorthHolland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L., and Clatworth, J.N. (1963). The comparative biology of closely related species. VI. Analysis of the growth of Trifolium repens and T. fragiferum in pure and mixed populations. - J. Exp. Bot. 14: 172–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, D.C., and Bazzaz, F.A. (1983). Physiological integration among intraclonal ramets in Solidago canadensis. - Ecology 64: 779–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, G.A., Nummi, W.O., and Viroster, J.F. (1961). Food-gathering behaviour of honey, bumble, and leaf-cutter bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Alberta. - The Canadian Entomologist 93: 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. (1981). A gentle depilation of the niche: Dicean resource sets in resource hyperspace. - Evol. Theor. 5: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. (1966). Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. - Evolution 20: 249–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanchan, S., and Jayachandra, (1980). Pollen allelopathy: A new phenomenon. - New Phytol. 84: 739–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C.J. (1979). Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 2nd ed. - New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.A., and Anderson, W.A. (1970). Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. - Amer. Natur. 104: 455–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968). Toward an evolutionary theory of the niche. In T.D. Drake (Ed.), Evolution and environment, 325–340. - New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. (1968). The theory of the niche. In R.C. Lewontin, (Ed.), Population biology and evolution, 159–176. - Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, J.A., Schimpf, D.J., Anderson, D.C., Smith, K.G., and Bayn, R.L., Jr. (1981). An organism-centered approach to some community and ecosystem concepts. - J. Theor. Biol. 88: 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, A., and Grime, J.P. (1976). An analysis of competitive ability in three perennial grasses. - New Phytol. 77: 431–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B.A. (1979). Coexistence between the seastars Asterias vulgaris and A. forbesi in a heterogeneous environment: A non-equilibrium explanation. - Oecologia 41: 245–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.S. (1967). Pattern and process in competition. - Adv. Ecol. Res. 4: 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.S. (1969). Competition and species diversity. In Diversity and stability in ecological systems. - Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A. (1961). Definition of competition among animals. In F.L. Milthorpe (Ed.), Mechanisms of biological competition, 40–61. - Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. XV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsi, M., Uchijima, Z., and Oikawa, T. (1973). Structure of foliage and photosynthesis. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E.I. (1982). Niche separation and species diversity in terrestrial vegetation. In E.I. Newman (Ed.), The plant community as a working mechanism, 61–77. - Spec. Publ. No. 1, Brit. Ecol. Soc. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ.

  • Patten, B.C., and Auble, F.T. (1981). System theory of the ecological niche. - Amer. Natur. 117: 893–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. (1983). Evolutionary ecology, 3rd edn. - New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A. (1980). Non-equilibrium coexistence of plants. - Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 107: 238–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin, A.J. (1982). Competition and coexistence of species. - London: Pitman Advanced Publishing Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M., and Jenik, J. (1975). Niche, habitat, and related ecological concepts. - Acta biother. 24: 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, B., and Westoby, M. (1982). Heteroecious rusts as agents of interference competition. - Evol. Theory 6: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.L. (1974). Allelopathy. - New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.L. (1979). Allelopathy - An update. - Bot. Rev. 45: 15–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E. (1979). Ecology, 2nd edn. - New York: Chiron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P.G. (1969). Competitive relationships among herbaceous grassland plants. - Bot. Rev. 35: 251–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: An introduction. - New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E.J. (1929). The biological equipment of species in relation to competition. - J. Ecol. 17: 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandfaer, J. (1968). Induced sterility as a factor in the competition between barley varieties. - Nature 218: 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandfaer, J. (1970). Barley stripe mosaic virus as the cause of the sterility interaction between barley varieties. - Hereditas 64: 150–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. - Science 185: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. (1982). The controversy over interspecific competition. - Amer. Sci. 70: 586–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1977). Resource competition between planktonic algae: An experimental and theoretical approach. - Ecology 58: 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinnin, R.O. (1972). Interference or competition. - Amer. Natur. 106: 672–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J.H. (1972). Niche theory. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangersky, P.J. (1972). Evolution and the niche concept. In E.S. Deevey (Ed.), Growth by Intussusception. Transactions Connecticut Academy Arts and Sciences 44: 367–376.

  • Werner, P.A. (1975). The effects of plant litter on germination in teasel, Dipsacus, sylvestris Huds. - Amer. Midi. Natur. 94: 470–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. (1967). Gradient analysis of vegetation. - Biol. Rev. 49: 207–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., Levin, S.A., and Root, R. B. (1973). Niche, habitat and ecotope. - Amer. Natur. 107: 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, J., and Read, D.J. (1982). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. III. Nutrient transfer between plants with mycorrhizal interconnection. - New Phytol. 90: 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M.F. (1973). Evolutionary ecology of plants. A review. Part IV. Niches and competition. - The Biologist 55: 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, P.N., and Franz, E.H. (1979). The effects of insect parasitism on plant competition: Greenbugs and barley. - Ecology 60: 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, C.T. (1960). On competition. - Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. 66: 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, C.T (1970). On the modelling of competitive phenomena. - Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Dynamics Numbers Popul., 269–281. (Oosterbeek, 1970).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Queen's University, K7L 3N6, Kingston, Ont., Canada

    Lonnie W. Aarssen

Authors
  1. Lonnie W. Aarssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aarssen, L.W. On the distinction between niche and competitive ability: Implications for coexistence theory. Acta Biotheor 33, 67–83 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052146

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052146

Keywords

Search

Navigation