Notes
This and all subsequent unqualified page references are to Woods (2018).
Woods, in his present naturalistic stance, is naturally unpersuaded by Routley and Meyer’s favoured approach: “Paraconsistent logics describe how formal logistic systems, not flesh-and-blood people, manage to spare themselves the perceived chaos of absolute inconsistency” (178).
Indeed, Woods reveals elsewhere that “the working title of Truth in Fiction was Sherlock’s Member: An Essay on Truth in Fiction . . . I am a bit sorry now that I chickened out” (Woods 2019, 358).
On Twitter, November 21, 2018. See also Uckelman (2018).
References
Cook, R. (2013). Canonicity and normativity in massive, serialized, collaborative fiction. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 71(3), 271–275.
D’Alessandro, W. (2016). Explicitism about truth in fiction. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 56(1), 53–65.
Empson, W. (1947). Seven types of ambiguity (2nd ed.). London: Chatto and Windus.
Gendler, T. (2010). Is Dumbledore gay? Who’s to say? In G. Bassham (Ed.), The ultimate Harry Potter and philosophy: Hogwarts for muggles (pp. 143–156). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Irwin, W. (2015). Authorial declaration and extreme actual intentionalism: Is Dumbledore gay? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 73(2), 141–147.
Knox, R. (1920). Studies in the literature of Sherlock Holmes. Blackfriars, 1(3), 154–172.
Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(1), 37–46.
Routley, R., & Meyer, R. (1976). Dialectical logic, classical logic, and the consistency of the world. Studies in Soviet Thought, 16(1/2), 1–25.
Sasson, J. (1988). Who cut Samson’s hair? (and other trifling issues raised by Judges 16). Prooftexts, 8(3), 333–339.
Sayers, D. (1946). Unpopular opinions. London: Victor Gollancz.
Uckelman, S. (2018). Fanfiction, canon, and possible worlds. Online at https://philarchive.org/rec/UCKFCA.
Woods, J. (1974). The logic of fiction: A philosophical sounding of deviant logic. The Hague: Mouton.
Woods, J. (2013). Errors of reasoning: Naturalizing the logic of inference. London: College Publications.
Woods, J. (2018). Truth in fiction: Rethinking its logic. Cham: Springer.
Woods, J. (2019). On the follies of intercourse between models and fiction: A naturalized causal-response diagnosis. In Á. Nepomuceno-Fernández, L. Magnani, F. Salguero-Lamillar, C. Barés-Gómez, & M. Fontaine (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology: Inferential models for logic, language, cognition and computation (pp. 337–371). Cham: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aberdein, A. Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic, by John Woods, Springer, 2018. Philosophia 49, 873–881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00262-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00262-x