Skip to main content
Log in

Pragmatism, Artificial Intelligence, and Posthuman Bioethics: Shusterman, Rorty, Foucault

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Michel Foucault's early works criticize the development of modern democratic institutions as creating a “surveillance society,” which functions to control bodies by making them feel watched and monitored full time. His later works attempt to recover private space by exploring subversive techniques of the body and language. Following Foucault, pragmatists like Richard Shusterman and Richard Rorty have also developed very rich approaches to this project, extending it deeper into the literary and somatic dimensions of self-stylizing. Yet, for a debate centered on the re-creation of the vision of the self, these discussions have yet to fully engage—even while they set the conditions for this engagement with—issues of posthuman technologies, such as AI, robotics, and genetic engineering. These certainly will constitute the primary engine of public institutional surveillance in the years to come. With this surveillance, the two spheres of private self-fashioning and public institutions will continue to evolve in relation to one another. As they do so, democratic society will change considerably. Perhaps Rorty's own normative and linguistic ideal of conversational maintenance may provide something of a democratic limit case on any future posthuman self-fashioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, J.J. (2002a). Philosophy After the Mirror of Nature: Rorty, Dewey, and Peirce on Pragmatism and Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol. Vol. 17. No. 3.

  • Abrams, J.J. (2002b). Solution to the Problem of Induction: Peirce, Apel, and Goodman on the Grue Paradox. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Fall 2002. Vol. XXXVIII, No. 4.

  • Abrams, J.J. (2002c) Aesthetics of Self-Fashioning and Cosmopolitanism: Foucault and Rorty on the Art of Living. Philosophy Today. Summer.

  • Abrams, J.J. (2003). Cinema and the Aesthetics of the Dynamical Sublime: Kant, Deleuze, and Heidegger and the Architecture of Film. In Film and Philosophy. Vol. VII.

  • Alcor Life Extension Foundation. (2002). www.alcor.org.

  • Apel, K.-O. (1981). Charles S. Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism, trans. J.M. Krois, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism, The Carus Lectures, 1988. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1994/ 1996). A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Exercises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, B. (1998). Immortality: How Science is Extending Your Lifespan and Changing the World. New York: Morrow, Williams, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1981). Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-Individualist Theory of Politics. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1984). Language and Politics: Why Does Language Matter to Political Philosophy? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1991). Life-World, Modernity and Critique: Paths Between Heidegger and the Frankfurt School. New York: Polity Press, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1953/ 1989). The Second Sex. trans. H.M. Parshley. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozois, G. (Ed.) (2002). Supermen: Tales of the Posthuman Future. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1993a). What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1993b). Heidegger on the Connexion between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics. In: Charles Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings [1972–1977], C. Gordon (Ed.), trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, K. Soper, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, In P. Rabinow (Ed). The Essential Works of Michel Foucault (1954–1984) Vol. 1. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1989). An Aesthetics of Existence. In Sylvere Logtringer (Ed.), Foucault Live: Collected Interviews, 1961–1984. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986). The Care of the Self: History of Sexuality Vol. 3, trans. R. Hurley, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, trans. W.M. Hohengarten, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, B. (2000). “Why the Future Doesn't Need Us,” Wired Magazine, April, web address: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html.

  • Kurzweil, R. (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.M. (1999). Sites of Vision: The Discursive Construction of Vision in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. (1999). Place and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, H. (1999). Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, A. (2000). The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1928). Thus Spake Zarathustra, Manuel Komroff (Ed.), New York: Tudor Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1999). The Cult of Personality. Review of Nehamas, The Art of Living. In The New Republic. January 4 and 11. pp. 32–36.

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1995). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1999). Religion As Conversation-stopper. In Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T.R. and Natter, W. (Eds.), (1996). The Social and Political Body. Guilford Press.

  • Shusterman, R. (2003a). Somaesthetics and The Second Sex: A Pragmatist Reading of a Feminist Classic. Hypatia. Vol. 18, No. 4, Fall/Winter.

  • Shusterman, R. (2004). The Silent, Limping Body of Philosophy. Taylor Carman and Mark Hansen (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2003b) Wittgenstein's Somaesthetics: Exploration and Melioration in Philosophy of Mind, Art, and Politics. In Cressida Heyes (Ed.). The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2000a). Performing Live: Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2002b). Somaesthetics and the Care of the Self: The Case of Foucault. The Monist. Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 530–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2002a). Emerson's Pragmatist Aesthetics. Revue Internationale Philosophie. 1/1999. No. 207, pp. 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2002b). Pragmatism and Criticism: A Response to Three Critics of Pragmatist Aesthetics. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16(1): 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (1999). Somaesthetics: A Disciplinary Proposal. In Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57:3, Summer.

  • Shusterman, R. (1997). Practicing Philosophy: Pragmatism and the Philosophical Life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (1992). Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2001). Living Across and Through the Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vita More, N. (2002). Primo. http://www.natasha.cc/primo3m+diagram.htm.

  • Vita More, N. (2001). Extropic Art Manifesto. Authored January 1, 1997; Revised May 27, 2001. http://www.extropic-art.com/extropic.htm.

  • Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J. (2000). Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert Dreyfus. Vol. I. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abrams, J.J. Pragmatism, Artificial Intelligence, and Posthuman Bioethics: Shusterman, Rorty, Foucault. Human Studies 27, 241–258 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042130.79208.c6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042130.79208.c6

Keywords

Navigation