Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Multifocal and Integrative View of the Influencers of Ethical Attitudes Using Qualitative Configurational Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical attitudes and behaviour are complex. This complexity extends to the influencers operating at different levels both outside and within the organisation, and in different combinations for different individuals. There is hence a growing need to understand the proximal and distal influencers of ethical attitudes, and how these operate in concert at the individual, organisational, and societal levels. Few studies have attempted to combine these main research streams and systematically examine their combined impact. The minority of studies that have taken a combined approach have often done so using conventional statistical and analytical techniques which imply linearity between variables—a situation that rarely exists in business settings and is likely to lead to simplistic or even erroneous conclusions. Applying a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach, this paper reports on the mutual and simultaneous influence of individual demographic factors (gender, education), as well as proximal and distal factors stemming from within and outside the work environment (e.g. treatment by one’s supervisor, country-level indicators of corruption perceptions) to understand individuals’ ethical views within the workplace (n = 525). The multiple configurations that emerged reveal the complex nature of influencers of ethical attitudes, and reinforce the view that “one size does not fit all”. We discuss these implications together with managerial recommendations and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, I. P. (1989). Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2015). AMOS 24 User’s guide. Crawfordville: AMOS Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, V. N. (2008). Managerial decision-making on moral issues and the effects of teaching ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, B. (2016). Ethical leadership in organizations: Concepts and implementations. Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S. (1994). Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: A multivariate model of corporate illegality. Journal of Management, 20(4), 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Criminological theory and organizational crime. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J., & Zabriskie, N. B. (1983). How ethical are industrial buyers? Industrial Marketing Management, 12(4), 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B., & Hunt, S. D. (1985). Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 13(4), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. T., & Sockell, D. (1992). Do company ethics training programs make a difference? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(9), 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2016). Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 231–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., Jolson, M. A., Kotabe, M., & Lim, C. U. (1991). A cross-national investigation of industrial salespeople’s ethical perceptions. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), 651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., & Levy, M. (1985). Ethics in retailing: Perceptions of retail salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1989). Humble decision making. Harvard Business Review, 67(4), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, L., & Herremans, I. (1995). Ethical behaviours in organizations: Directed by the formal or informal systems? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. (1988). An examination of marketing ethics: Role of the decision maker, consequences of the decision, management position, and sex of the respondent. Journal of Macromarketing, 8(2), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, R., Paternostro, S., & Rigolini, J. (2003). Individual attitudes towards corruption: do social effects matter? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3122). World Bank Group, Washington, DC.

  • Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (6th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business, 64(5), 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1990). The attainment of solidarity in intentional communities. Rationality and Society, 2(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. (2015). Corrupt Research: The case for reconceptualising empirical management and social science. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichino, A., & Maggi, G. (2000). Work environment and individual background: Explaining regional shirking differentials in a large Italian firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 1057–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. W., Wood, C. M., & Zboja, J. J. (2013). The dissolution of ethical decision-making in organizations: A comprehensive review and model. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E., & Bethke, A. L. (1987). Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: myth or reality? Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, G. F., & Corriher, S. E. (1994). The relationship of age, gender, experience and awareness of written ethics policies to business decision making. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 59(1), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research—the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 14(1), 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. S., Schaupp, D., & Parsons, B. (1988). Pygmalion effect: An issue for business education and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(3), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, K., Park, Y. H., & Singh, N. (2015). Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: Boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. (1989). Ethic courses: useless. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: The role of gender, academic status, and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. S., Payne, G. T., & Everet, R. E. (2016). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K. (2004). Decision making and business ethics: the implications of using image theory in preference to rational choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: Penn Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, J. W., & Ruch, W. A. (1975). Ethics of management and management of ethics. MSU Business Topics, 23(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary. (2017). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (online). Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.oxfordadvancedlearnersdictionary.com/dictionary.

  • Perryer, C., & Scott-Ladd, B. (2014). Deceit, misuse and favours: Understanding and measuring attitudes to ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perryer, C., & Tsahuridu, E. (2013). An exploration of influences on attitudes to giving and receiving gifts. Asia Pacific Management Review, 18(3), 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(3), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S., & Waeraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1987). Ethics in American companies: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5), 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. Tucson: University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–121). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of corporate moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Deemer, D., Barnett, R., Spickelmier, J., & Volker, J. (1986). Life experiences and developmental pathways. In J. R. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: Advances in research and theory (pp. 28–58). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. A., & Newstrom, J. W. (1975). How unethical are we. Supervisory Management, 20(11), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q. (2008). The consolidation of democracy: comparing Europe and Latin America. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., Hannes, L., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioural integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. M., Banerjee, D., & Simpson, C. L. Jr. (1994). Softlifting: A model of motivating factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (1992). The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., & Vitell, S. J. (1990). Marketing ethics: Factors influencing perceptions of ethical problems and alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 10(1), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., Worrell, D. L., & Stead, J. G. (1990). An integrative model for understanding and managing ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E., Richardson, W. D., & Abramowitz, A. E. (1989). Perceptual differences of ethical decision situations business vs. law: A difference of opinion? In D. F. Ray (ed.), Southern Management Association Proceedings (pp. 199–201). Mississippi State, Starkville, MS.

  • Stevens, R. E., Harris, O. J., & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students: A pilot study. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th edn.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Research in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thygeson, N. M., Solberg, L. I., Asche, S. E., Fontaine, P., Pawlson, L. G., & Scholle, S. H. (2012). Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) to explore the relationship between medical “Homeness” and quality. Health Services Research, 47(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015: Technical Methodology Note. Retrieved from: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015#downloads.

  • Transparency International (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved from: http://www.transparency.org/cpi.

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., Ren, L. R., Bingham, J. B., & Gogus, C. I. (2009). The influence of distributive justice on lying for and stealing from a supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S., Nwachukwa, S., & Barnes, J. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimalasiri, J. S., Pavri, F., & Jalil, A. A. (1996). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1331–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2010a). Bridging the chasm between survey and case study research: Research methods for achieving generalization, accuracy, and complexity. Industry Marketing Management, 39(1), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2010b). Case study research: Theory, methods, practice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2016). Diffusion and adoption of good science: Overcoming the dominant logic of NHST and the reporting of rubbish. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 23(4), 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Bednall, T. C. (2016). Antecedents of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UWA Business School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, Australia

    Nicole A. Celestine, Catherine Leighton & Chris Perryer

Authors
  1. Nicole A. Celestine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Leighton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris Perryer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Leighton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

A. Celestine, N., Leighton, C. & Perryer, C. A Multifocal and Integrative View of the Influencers of Ethical Attitudes Using Qualitative Configurational Analysis. J Bus Ethics 162, 103–122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4011-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4011-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation