Emiliano Acosta e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Emiliano Acosta e-mail(Inicie sesión)

Resumen

396
This is a comparative study of the concept of nature in Kant and Fichte’s proposals for perpetual peace. I will argue that Kant and Fichte’s ideas of perpetual peace present two very different ways of dealing with nature: whereas Kant’s proposal consists of administrating the natural unsociable inclinations of human beings, departing from the assumption that the unsociable sociability of men is not only inherent to human nature but also the motor of the historical progress of humanity, Fichte, on the contrary, advocates for a total repression of these inclinations, departing from the postulate that the historical progress of humanity concerns exclusively the spiritual or intelligible dimension of human existence.

Referencias

E. ACOSTA, G. VAN DE VIJVER, While reading Kant’s Perpetual Peace, in D. PRAET (ed.), Philosophy of War and Peace (VUBPress, Brussel, 2017) 131-144.

G. CAVALLAR, Cosmopolitanisms in Kant’s philosophy, “Ethics & Global Politics” 5/2 (2012) 95-118.

J. G. FICHTE, Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

E. FUCHS, R. LAUTH, H. JACOBS, H. GLIWITZKY (eds.), (Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1964-2012).

I. KANT, Gesammelte Schriften, vols. 1-22 ed. by the Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 23 ed. by the Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, vol. 24ff. ed. by the Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Gö ttingen (DeGruyter, Berlin, 1900ff.).

I. KANT, Idea for a Universal History with the Cosmopolitan Aim, transl. by A. Wood, in A. OKSENBERG RORTY, J. SCHMIDT (eds.), Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009) 9-23.

I. KANT, Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, transl. by D. Colclausure, in P. KLEINGELD (ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History (Yale University Press, New Heaven/London, 2006) 67-109.

P. KLEINGELD, Kant’s Changing Cosmopolitanism, in A. OKSENBERG RORTY, J. SCHMIDT, J. (eds.), Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009) 171-186.

I. NAKHIMOVSKY, The Closed Commercial State (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011).

H. TRAUB, Fichtes Begriff der Natur. Rezeptiongeschichte im Wandel - Ein Forschungsbericht, in H. GIRNDT (ed.), “Natur” in der Transzendentalphilosophie. Eine Tagung zum Gedenken an Reinhard Lauth (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2015) 77-134.

L. YPI, Natura Daedala Rerum? On the Justifi cation of Historical Progress in Kant’s Guarantee of Perpetual Peace, “Kantian Review” 14/2 (2010) 118-148.

Métricas

Search GoogleScholar




Detalles

Detalles del artículo

Sección
Estudios
Biografía del autor/a

Emiliano Acosta, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Pleinlaan 2, office 5C447

1050, Brussels