Abstract
Backdating of stock options is an example of an agency problem. It has emerged despite all the measures (i.e., new regulations and additional corporate governance mechanisms) aimed at addressing such problems? Beyond such negative controlling measures, a more positive empowering approach based on ethics may also be necessary. What ethical measures need to be taken to address the agency problem? What values and norms should guide the board of directors in protecting the shareholders’ interests? To examine these issues, we first discuss the role values and norms can play with respect to underlying corporate governance and the proper role of directors, such as transparency, accountability, integrity (which is reflected in proper mechanisms of checks and balances), and public responsibility. Second, we discuss various stakeholder approaches (e.g., government, directors, managers, and shareholders) by which conflicts of interest (i.e., the agency problem) can be addressed. Third, we assess the practice of backdating stock options, as an illustration of the agency problem, in terms of whether the practice is legally acceptable or ethically justifiable. Fourth, we proceed to an analysis of good corporate governance practice involving backdating options based on a series of ethical standards including: (1) trustworthiness; (2) utilitarianism; (3) justice; and (4) Kantianism. We conclude that while executive compensation schemes (e.g., stock options) were originally intended to help remedy the agency problem by tying together the interests of the executives and shareholders, these schemes may have actually become “part of the problem,” and that the solution ultimately depends upon whether directors and executives accept that all of their actions must be based on a set of core ethical values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, A. M., A. Aderet and A. Sadeh (2007) Does Ethics Matter to e-Consumers. International Journal of Internet Commerce. 6(2): 19–34
Adam, A. M. and T. Shavit: 2008a, ‘How Can a Ratings Based Method for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Provide an Incentive to Firms Excluded from Socially Responsible Investment Indices to Invest in CSR?’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9600-4
Adam, A. M. and T. Shavit: 2008b, ‘The Business of Business: Re-Modeled in Economic and Ethical Terms’, Presented in The 5th ADERSE (Association for the Development of Education and Research on Corporate Social Responsibility) Conference. Grenoble, France, 11 January, http://www.vmanagement.co.il/articles/aderse.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2008
AFL-CIO: 2007, ‘Stock Options Backdating and Spring Loading – CEO Pay Run Amok’, http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/stockoptions.cfm
Arbel-Ganz, O.: 2003, ‘Regulation’, Working Paper in Hebrew, The Israel Democracy Institute
Arya, A. Sun, H.L. (2004). “Stock Option Repricing: Heads I Win, Tails You Lose,” Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 297–312
Barron, J. (2007). “Options Backdating Scandals Take the Main Stage,” Business Credit, 109(3), 30
Bebchuk, L. A. and J. M. Fried: 2003, April, ‘Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem’, Discussion Paper No. 421, Harvard Law School
Berle, A., and Means G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. NY: MacMillion
Bizjak, J., M. Lemmon and R. Whitby: 2007, February, ‘Option Backdating and Board Overlocks’, AFA New Orleans Meeting Paper
Boatright, J.: 2007, Ethics in Finance, 2nd edition (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA
Bowie, N., P. Werhane: 2004, Management Ethics, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA
Boyd, D.P. (2003). Chicanery in the corporate culture: WorldCom or World Con? Corporate Governance. 3(1): 83–85
Braum, M. and Sharma, A. (2007). “Should the CEO Also Be Chair of the Board? An Empirical Examination of Family-Controlled Public Firms,” Family Business Review. 20(2): 111–126
Bruhl, R.H. (2003). “A Possible Solution to the Principal-Agent Problem Posed by the Contemporary Corporate CEO,” Journal of Business Ethics. 48(4): 401–402
Bryce, R. (2002). Pipe Dreams And the Death of Enron. NY: PublicAffairs
Bunge, M. (1989). “Treatise on Basic Philosophy,” Vol 8. Ethics: The Good and the Right. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company
Clapman, P.C. (2005). “Shareholder governance activism at TIAA-CREF,” International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 2(3): 219–227
Clearly, B.: 2007, ‘Managing the Risks Associated with␣Stock Options Backdating’, The CPA Journal, April. http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2007/407/perspectives/p12.htm
CNW: 2005, December, ‘CIBC Adopts New CEO Compensation Model’, http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2005/01/c1382.html
Corporate Watch: 2007, ‘Stock Options Backdating and Spring Loading – CEO Pay Run Amok Stock Options␣Backdating and Spring Loading – CEO Pay Run Amok’, http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/stockoptions.cfm
Cosenza, E. (2007). The Holy Grail of Corporate Governance Reform: Independence or Democracy? Brigham Young University Law Review. 1: 1–54
Engelen, P.J. and Liedekerke, L.V. (2007). “The Ethics of Insider Trading Revisited,” Journal of Business Ethics. 74(4): 497–507
Felo, A.J. (2001). “Ethics Programs, Board Involvement, and Potential Conflicts of Interest in Corporate Governance,” Journal of Business Ethics. 32(3): 205–218
Forelle, C. and J. Bandler: 2006, ‘The Perfect Payday; Some CEOs Reap Millions By Landing Stock Options When They Are Most Valuable; Luck – Or Something Else?’, The Wall Street Journal, A1
Forelle, C., J. Bandler and M. Maremont: 2006, July 15, ‘C. Executive Pay: The 9/11 Factor’, The Wall Street Journal. A1
Friedman, M.: 1970, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, New York Times Magazine, 33(30), 122–125
Harshberger, S., and Jois, G.U. (2007) Looking Back and Looking Forward: Sarbanes-Oxley and the Future of Corporate Governance. Akron Law Review. 40:1
Heron, R. A. and E. Lie: 2006, ‘What Fraction of Stock Options Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?’, Working Paper, University of Iowa and University of Indiana. http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/faculty/elie/Grants-11-01-2006.pdf
Jayaratnam, A.: 2007, ‘Prosecuting Stock-Option Backdating: The Ethics of Enforcement Techniques’, The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 20(3): 755–767
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownerhip Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360
Kim, A.K. and Nofsinger, J.R. (2007). Corporate Governance. (2nd ed). NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall
Laufer, W.S. (2006). Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal Liability. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago
Lunsford, J. L., A. Pasztor and J. S. Lubline: 2005, March 8, ‘Emergency Exit: Boeing’s CEO Forced to Resign Over his Affair with Employee; Stonecipher was brought into Restore Credibility in Wake of Other Scandals; Undone by a Secret Tipster’, Wall Street Journal, A.1
Maich, S.: 2007, November 28, ‘Research in Motion Finds a Better Option’, Macleans.ca, http://www.macleans.ca/business/companies/article.jsp?content=20071128_106589_106589. Accessed 7 Jan 2008
Matsumura, E.M, and Shin, J.Y. (2005). “Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences,” The Journal of Business Ethics, 62: 101–113
McLean, B. and P. Elkind. (2003). The Smartest Guys in The Room. N.Y: Penguin Group
Montgomery, D.: 2006, September 22, ‘Backdating Options Grants: A Dead Man’s Tale’, Business Ethics␣News. http://juggernautco.typepad.com/business_ethics_news/2006/09/backdating_opti.html
Narayanan, M.P., Schipani, C.A., and Najet-Seyhun, H. (June 2007). “The Economic Impact of Backdating Executive Stock Options,” Michigan Law Review. 105(8): 1598–1642
Newswise: 2006, August 16, ‘Experts Call Expensing Stock Options Improper Accounting’, Berkeley Haas School of Business, University of California, http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/522795/
Peters, G.B. (2001). The Politics of Bureaucracy. 5thEd. NY: Routledge
Plitch, P.: 2004, June 21, ‘Corporate Governance (A␣Special Report); Blowing the Whistle: Sarbanes-Oxley Requires that Companies Treat Internal Complaints – and Complainers – Seriously’, Wall Street Journal, R.6
Raiborn, C., M. Massoud, R. Morris and C. Pier: 2007, ‘Ethics of Options Repricing and Backdating’, The CPA Journal, October, http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2007/1007/perspectives/p6.htm
Research in Motion: 2007, March 5, ‘RIM Provides Status Update and Reports on Results of Internal Review of Stock Option Grants by Special Committee’, http://www.rim.com/news/press/2007/pr-05_03_2007-01.shtml
Rodgers, W. and Gago, S. (2003). “A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation,” Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2): 189–201
Saul, S.: 2006, July 17, ‘Study Finds Backdating of Options Widespread’, New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/17/business/17options.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Schwartz, M.S., Dunfee, T. W., and Kline, M.J. (2005). “Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors? Journal of Business Ethics. 58(1–3): 79–100
Sesil, J.C., Kroumova, M.K., Kruse, D.L., Blasi, J.R. (2007). “Broad-based Employee Stock Options in the U.S. - Company Performance and Characteristics.” Management Revue, 18(1): 5–22
Simon, E.: 2006, ‘Options Backdating: Lost Share Price, Additional Compensation Total More Than $10 Billion’, Associated Press, October 24
Stecklow, S.: 2006, ‘Options Study Becomes Required Reading’, The Wall Street Journal, May 30th, B1
Surowiecki, J.: 2006, ‘The Dating Game’, The New Yorker, November 6, http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061106ta_talk_surowiecki
Thompson, M. (2006). Are You Built to Last? Chief Executive. 222:24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Authors names are listed alphabetically.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adam, A.M., Schwartz, M.S. Corporate Governance, Ethics, and the Backdating of Stock Options. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 1), 225–237 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9941-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9941-7