Summary
There is a traditional reluctance among methodologists to study the ever increasingly important phenomenon of research-projects, research-project evaluations, etc. The reason for this is that projects are embedded in programs and programs in intellectual frameworks, or conceptual frameworks, or metaphysical systems. It sounds dogmatic to judge the product of research by a reference to a metaphysical system. Yet, first of all, it is not so dogmatic if judgment can go both ways, if we have competing systems at work, and if what we assess is not the outcome of a project but the existing assessments of projects prior to their implementation. Indeed, one of the most obvious things to do is to compare our assessments of projects before and after their implementations. To this end some further theorizing is required.
Here, then, is a sketch of the theoretical background to such investigations, a sketch of what has been said thus far relating to the matters (not yet) in hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agassi, J. The methodology of research projects: A sketch. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8, 30–38 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800412
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800412