Skip to main content
Log in

Does the Notion of ‘Doing Well by Doing Good’ Prevail Among Entrepreneurial Ventures in a Developing Nation?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rise in ethical and social responsibility awareness in contemporary businesses has led to assumptions that the associated behaviours would enable competitive advantage to be attained as a firm distinguishes itself from its competitors through such practices. This paper reports on a study conducted on the prevalence of such practices among entrepreneurial ventures in an emerging economy (Malaysia), and the effect of such practices on both financial and non-financial performance. A sequential inter-method mixing design was employed in which during stage 1, a series of semi-structured interviews with ten Malaysian SME founder-owners were conducted. Stage 2 involved a survey in which a total of 212 usable questionnaires were received. The results of the first phase of the research (qualitative) found evidence that entrepreneurial ventures in Malaysia do generally engage in both ethical and socially responsible practices. The subsequent model testing using SEM, however, revealed that while ethical practices were positively associated with venture performance, socially responsible practices were not. This may indicate that while entrepreneurial ventures in emerging economies like Malaysia become quickly aware of the more serious consequences of not adopting ethical practices, the concern for social issues may still be lacking, i.e., in terms of motivations, they may be closer to the profitable end of the philanthropy versus profitability spectrum. While the findings may be equivocal, we believe that the paper makes the following two significant contributions: (1) it provides an empirical test of the importance of ethical and socially responsible practices to entrepreneurial venture performance and (2) it furthers understanding of how and why this may be different in an emerging economy context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Ahmad, N., & Seet, P.-S. (2006). Financial and non-financial indicators of business success: A study of Australian and Malaysian SME entrepreneurs. Paper presented at ANZAM annual conference, Rockhampton, QLD.

  • Amran, A., Ling, L. L., & Yahya, S. (2007). A study of corporate philanthropic traits among major Malaysian corporations. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(4), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, T. R. (1992). Integrating business ethics into an undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1993). Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P., & Griffin, R. W. (2000). Management: Australia in a global context. Brisbane: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. Oxford: Capstone Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferell, L. (2000). Business ethics (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 391–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Brantjes, A., & Hoorn, R. (2002). Psychological success factors of small scale businesses in Namibia: The roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation, and the environment. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fülöp, G., Hisrich, R. D., & Szegedi, K. (2000). Business ethics and social responsibility in transition economies. The Journal of Management Development, 19(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. (2005). The entrepreneur as the core competence of the firm: Implication for management educators. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Small Business Network, 2.

  • Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, B. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Eaglewood Cliff, NJ: The Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatten, T. S. (2006). Small business management: Entrepreneurship and beyond (3rd ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, Z. (2004). A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organizational performance. International Business Review, 13(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2000). Ethics Revisited. The 1990s: An “ethical decade” or a decade of hypocrisy? Retrieved Dec 15, 2001, from http://commerce.flinders.edu.au/researchpapers/00-6.htm.

  • Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Naffziger, D. W. (1997). An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., Petty, J. W., Palich, L. E., & McKinney, J. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small business responsibility in developing countries: A threat or an opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S., & Strange, A. (1994). Female entrepreneurs: Success by whose standards? In M. Tanton (Ed.), Women in management: A developing presence (pp. 172–184). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Schindehutte, M., Walton, J., & Allen, J. (2002). The ethical context of entrepreneurship: Proposing and testing a developmental framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. B., Tailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathaban, V., & Rahim, N. A. (2005, September 16). Big earners, small givers? Malaysian Business, Vol. 1, pp 13–19.

  • Quinn, J. J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushworth, S., & Gillin, M. (2006). Assessing personal value systems and motivations of successful serial entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the 3rd AGSE international research exchange, 8–10 February 2006, Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Samson, D., & Daft, R. L. (2003). Management: Pacific Rim edition. Southbank, VIC: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, D. K., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermerhorn, J. R. (2002). Management (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: Experiences from the U.K. and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L., & Rutherfoord, R. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8, 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushedo, B. O., & Ehiri, J. E. (2006). Ethical challenges in ecological policy: Global thinking and local action. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1625–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zairi, M., & Peters, J. (2002). The impact of social responsibility on business performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(4), 174–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulkifli, N., & Amran, A. (2006). Realizing corporate social responsibility in Malaysia: A view from the accounting profession. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noor Hazlina Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, N.H., Ramayah, T. Does the Notion of ‘Doing Well by Doing Good’ Prevail Among Entrepreneurial Ventures in a Developing Nation?. J Bus Ethics 106, 479–490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1012-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1012-9

Keywords

Navigation