Abstract
The rise in ethical and social responsibility awareness in contemporary businesses has led to assumptions that the associated behaviours would enable competitive advantage to be attained as a firm distinguishes itself from its competitors through such practices. This paper reports on a study conducted on the prevalence of such practices among entrepreneurial ventures in an emerging economy (Malaysia), and the effect of such practices on both financial and non-financial performance. A sequential inter-method mixing design was employed in which during stage 1, a series of semi-structured interviews with ten Malaysian SME founder-owners were conducted. Stage 2 involved a survey in which a total of 212 usable questionnaires were received. The results of the first phase of the research (qualitative) found evidence that entrepreneurial ventures in Malaysia do generally engage in both ethical and socially responsible practices. The subsequent model testing using SEM, however, revealed that while ethical practices were positively associated with venture performance, socially responsible practices were not. This may indicate that while entrepreneurial ventures in emerging economies like Malaysia become quickly aware of the more serious consequences of not adopting ethical practices, the concern for social issues may still be lacking, i.e., in terms of motivations, they may be closer to the profitable end of the philanthropy versus profitability spectrum. While the findings may be equivocal, we believe that the paper makes the following two significant contributions: (1) it provides an empirical test of the importance of ethical and socially responsible practices to entrepreneurial venture performance and (2) it furthers understanding of how and why this may be different in an emerging economy context.
References
Ahmad, N., & Seet, P.-S. (2006). Financial and non-financial indicators of business success: A study of Australian and Malaysian SME entrepreneurs. Paper presented at ANZAM annual conference, Rockhampton, QLD.
Amran, A., Ling, L. L., & Yahya, S. (2007). A study of corporate philanthropic traits among major Malaysian corporations. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(4), 21–30.
Bishop, T. R. (1992). Integrating business ethics into an undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 291–299.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1993). Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 391–408.
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699–719.
Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342–367.
Davidson, P., & Griffin, R. W. (2000). Management: Australia in a global context. Brisbane: Wiley.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. Oxford: Capstone Publishers.
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferell, L. (2000). Business ethics (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Fisher, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 391–1000.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Frese, M., Brantjes, A., & Hoorn, R. (2002). Psychological success factors of small scale businesses in Namibia: The roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation, and the environment. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 259–282.
Fülöp, G., Hisrich, R. D., & Szegedi, K. (2000). Business ethics and social responsibility in transition economies. The Journal of Management Development, 19(1), 5–31.
Gibb, A. A. (2005). The entrepreneur as the core competence of the firm: Implication for management educators. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Small Business Network, 2.
Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 41–54.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, B. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Eaglewood Cliff, NJ: The Prentice Hall International.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Hatten, T. S. (2006). Small business management: Entrepreneurship and beyond (3rd ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.
Hoque, Z. (2004). A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organizational performance. International Business Review, 13(4), 485–502.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.
Jones, J. (2000). Ethics Revisited. The 1990s: An “ethical decade” or a decade of hypocrisy? Retrieved Dec 15, 2001, from http://commerce.flinders.edu.au/researchpapers/00-6.htm.
Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311.
Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Naffziger, D. W. (1997). An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 24–33.
Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., Petty, J. W., Palich, L. E., & McKinney, J. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183.
Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small business responsibility in developing countries: A threat or an opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 38–53.
Marlow, S., & Strange, A. (1994). Female entrepreneurs: Success by whose standards? In M. Tanton (Ed.), Women in management: A developing presence (pp. 172–184). London: Routledge.
Morris, M. H., Schindehutte, M., Walton, J., & Allen, J. (2002). The ethical context of entrepreneurship: Proposing and testing a developmental framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 331–361.
Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Murphy, G. B., Tailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15–23.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Prathaban, V., & Rahim, N. A. (2005, September 16). Big earners, small givers? Malaysian Business, Vol. 1, pp 13–19.
Quinn, J. J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 119–127.
Rushworth, S., & Gillin, M. (2006). Assessing personal value systems and motivations of successful serial entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the 3rd AGSE international research exchange, 8–10 February 2006, Auckland, New Zealand.
Samson, D., & Daft, R. L. (2003). Management: Pacific Rim edition. Southbank, VIC: Thomson.
Sarasvathy, D. K., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33(2), 207–225.
Schermerhorn, J. R. (2002). Management (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.
Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: Experiences from the U.K. and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 43–53.
Spence, L., & Rutherfoord, R. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8, 126–139.
Ushedo, B. O., & Ehiri, J. E. (2006). Ethical challenges in ecological policy: Global thinking and local action. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), 31–42.
Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1625–1636.
Zairi, M., & Peters, J. (2002). The impact of social responsibility on business performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(4), 174–178.
Zulkifli, N., & Amran, A. (2006). Realizing corporate social responsibility in Malaysia: A view from the accounting profession. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 101–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, N.H., Ramayah, T. Does the Notion of ‘Doing Well by Doing Good’ Prevail Among Entrepreneurial Ventures in a Developing Nation?. J Bus Ethics 106, 479–490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1012-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1012-9