Abstract
A few results generalizing well-known classical model theory ones have been obtained in institution theory these last two decades (e.g. Craig interpolation, ultraproduct, elementary diagrams). In this paper, we propose a generalized institution-independent version of the Beth definability theorem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiguier, M., C. Gaston, and P. Le Gall, ‘Feature Specification: a Logic-Independent Approach’, Tech. rep., Université d’Évry, 2004.
Aiguier, M., and P.-Y. Schobbens, ‘A Note on Robinson Consistency Lemma’, Tech. rep., Université d’Évry, 2006. Available at www.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/~aiguier.
Barwise J (1974) ‘Axioms for Abstract Model Theory’. Annals of Mathematical Logic 7: 221–265
Borzyszkowski, T., ‘Generalized Interpolation in CASL’, Information Processing letters, (2001).
Borzyszkowski T. (2002) ‘Logical Systems for Structured Specifications’. Theoretical Computer Science 286: 197–245
Diaconescu R., (2002). ‘Herbrand Theorems in Arbitrary Institutions’. Information Processing Letters 90(1): 29–39.
Diaconescu R. (2003). ‘Institution-Independent Ultraproducts’. Fundamenta Informaticae 55(3-4): 321–348.
Diaconescu R. (2004) ‘An Institution-Independent Proof of Craig Interpolation Property’. Studia Logica 77(1): 59–79
Diaconescu R. (2004) ‘Interpolation in Grothendieck Institutions’. Theoretical Computer Science 55(3-4): 321–348
Diaconescu, R., J.A. Goguen, and P. Stefaneas, ‘Logical Support for Modularisation’, in G. Huet, and G. Plotkin, (eds.), Logical Environment, 1993, pp. 83–130.
Dimitrakos T., and Maibaum T. (2000) ‘On a Generalized Modularization Theorem’. Information Processing Letter 74: 65–71
Fine K. (1979) ‘Failures for the Interpolation Lemma in Quantified Modal Logic’. Journal of Symbolic Logic 44: 201–206
Gabbay D., and Maksimova L. (2004) Interpoation and Definability Volume 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Găină D., and Popescu A. (2007) ‘An Institution-Independent Proof of Robinson Consistency Theorem’. Studia Logica 85(1): 41–73
Goguen, J., and R. Burstall, ‘A Study in the Foundation of Programming Methodology: Specifications, Institutions, Charters and Parchments’, in D Pitt, S. Abramsky, A. Poigné, and D. Rydeheard, (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on CategoryTheory and Computer Programming, vol. 240 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, 1985, pp. 313–333.
Goguen J., and Burstall R. (1992) ‘Institutions: Abstract Model Theory for Specification and Programming’. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 39(1): 95–146
Salibra, A., and G. Scollo, ‘Compactness and Löwenheim-Skolem Properties in Pre-Institution Categories’, in C.Rauszer, (ed.), Algebraic Methods in Logic and in Computer Science, vol. 28, Banach Center Publications, 1993, pp. 67–94.
Salibra A., and Scollo G. (1996) ‘Interpolation and Compactness in Categories of Pre-Institutions’. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 6(3): 261–286
Sernadas A., Sernadas C., and Caleiro C. (1999) ‘Fibring of Logics as a Categorial Construction’. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(2): 149–179
Tarlecki A. (1985) ‘On the Existence of Free Models in Abstract Algebraic Institutions’. Theoretical Computer Science 37(3): 269–304
Tarlecki A. (1986) ‘Quasi-Varieties in Abstract Algebraic Institutions’. Journal of Computer and System Science 33(3): 269–304
Tarlecki, A., Algebraic Foundations of Systems Specification, chap. Institutions: An Abstract Framework for Formal Specifications, IFIP State-of-the-Art Reports, Springer Verlag, 1999.
Tarski A. (1944) ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’. Philos. Phenomenological Research 4: 13–47
Veloso P., and Fiadeiro S., Veloso J.-L. (2002) ‘On Local Modularity and Interpolation in Entailment Systems’. Information Processing Letter 82: 203–211
Veloso P., and Maibaum T. (1995) ‘On the Modularization Theorem for Logical Specifications’. Information Processing Letter, 53(5): 287–293
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiguier, M., Barbier, F. An Institution-independent Proof of the Beth Definability Theorem. Stud Logica 85, 333–359 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9043-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9043-z