Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.) Interpreting Precedents: a comparative study.

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Branting, K. L. 1993. A reduction-graph model of ratio decidendi. In proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 40–49. ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. 1985. Major Legal Systems in the World Today: an Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. Stevens, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Gerald Duckworth & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya, B. 1997. On modeling creativity in legal reasoning. In proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 180–189. ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. 1986. Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology. Journal of Legal Education 36, 518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, E. H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N. 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. & Friedman, M. T. 1993. BankXX: A program to generate argument through case-base search. In proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 117–124. ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. W. 1984. The player and the cards: nihilism and legal theory. Yale Law Journal 94, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. 1964. Legal System and Lawyer's Reasonings. Stevens & Sons Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. 1993. On analogical reasoning. Harvard Law Review 106, 741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, P. M. 1995. The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: judicial writings. University of Chicago Law Review 62, 1371.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Law and Computing, University of Durham, 50 North Bailey, Durham, DH1 3ET, England

    Michael Aikenhead (PhD candidate and research assistant at the)

Authors
  1. Michael Aikenhead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aikenhead, M. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.) Interpreting Precedents: a comparative study.. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8, 283–288 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347201300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347201300

Keywords

Search

Navigation