Abstract
American criminal law reflects the absence of any general duty of Good Samaritanism. Nonetheless, there are some circumstances in which it imposes affirmative duties to aid others. In those circumstances, however, the duty to aid is canceled whenever aiding subjects the actor to a certain level of risk or sacrifice, a level that can be less than the risk or sacrifice faced by the beneficiary if not aided. In this article, I demonstrate that this approach to limiting affirmative duties to aid encounters the same problem of moral arbitrariness as does a “moral catastrophe” override of deontological side-constraints.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander, L. Affirmative duties and the limits of self-sacrifice. Law Philos 15, 65–74 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143972
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143972