Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Darwinian Theory of Cultural Evolution Can Promote an Evolutionary Synthesis for the Social Sciences

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolutionary synthesis of the 1930s and 1940s integrated the study of biological microevolution and biological macroevolution into the theoretically consistent and hugely productive field of evolutionary biology. A similar synthesis has yet to occur for the study of culture, and the social sciences remain fragmented and theoretically incompatible. Here, it is suggested that a Darwinian theory of cultural evolution can promote such a synthesis. Earlier non-Darwinian theories of cultural evolution, such as progress theories, lacked key elements of a Darwinian theory of cultural evolution (e.g., population thinking) that are necessary to promote a synthesis, while other contemporary theories of cultural evolution, such as memetics, make too stringent neo-Darwinian assumptions (e.g., high-fidelity replication) that are inconsistent with evidence regarding cultural transmission. Several examples are given which indicate the beginnings of an evolutionary synthesis for culture, where patterns of cultural macroevolution have been explained in terms of underlying cultural microevolutionary forces. Finally, it is argued that experimental simulations of cultural evolution can play an important role in this emerging synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold SJ, Pfrender ME, Jones AG (2001) The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112–113: 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Groups, Leadership, and Men (Guetzkow H, ed), 177–190. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran S (2001) The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature 12: 351–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger R, ed (2000a) Darwinizing Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger R (2000b) The life history of culture learning in a face-to-face society. Ethos 28: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger R (2002) The Electric Meme. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter A (2000) Transformation between scientific and social representations of conception: The method of serial reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology 39: 521–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering. Oxford: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla G (1988) The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum WM, Richerson PJ, Efferson CM, Paciotti BM (2004) Cultural evolution in laboratory microsocieties including traditions of rule giving and rule following. Evolution and Human Behavior 25: 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley RA, Hahn MW, Shennan SJ (2004) Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1443–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger RL, Eerkens J (1999) Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity 64: 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford L (1963) “Red Ochre” caches from the Michigan area: A possible case of cultural drift. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19: 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore S (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2005) The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1965) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: Social Change in Developing Areas (Barringer HR, Blanksten GI, Mack RW, eds), 19–49. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1974) Evolutionary epistemology. In: The Philosophy of Karl Popper (Schilpp PA, ed), 413–463. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro RL (1970) A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169: 733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RL (2000) Towards a new evolutionary synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RL (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Lande R, Slatkin M (1982) A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36: 474–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua HF, Leu J, Nisbett RE (2005) Culture and diverging views of social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 925–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant EW (1980) The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1968) The Origin of Species. London: Penguin. Orig. 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (2003) The Descent of Man. London: Gibson Square. Orig. 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: The dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MW, Laland KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 453–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracchia J, Lewontin RC (1999) Does culture evolve? History and Theory 38: 52–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman D (1974) The evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer. Current Anthropology 15: 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R (1940) The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3: 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg JH (1959) Language and Evolution. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halder G, Callerts P, Gehring WJ (1995) Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science 267: 1788–1792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J (2001) Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations. American Anthropologist 103: 992–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 19: 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ (in press) Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature

  • Henrich J, Gil White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige. Evolution and Human Behavior 22: 165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett B, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1986) Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. American Anthropologist 88: 922–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2001) Is social evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian? In: Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics (Laurent J, Nightingale J, eds), 87–118. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (2000) Taking memetics seriously. In: Darwinizing Culture (Aunger R, ed), 43–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS (1942) Evolution, the Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2000) The poverty of selectionism. Anthropology Today 16: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2007) The trouble with ‘evolutionary biology’. Anthropology Today 23: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insko CA, Gilmore R, Drenan S, Lipsitz A, Moehle D, Thibaut JW (1983) Trade versus expropriation in open groups: A comparison of two types of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 977–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insko CA, Thibaut JW, Moehle D, Wilson M, Diamond WD, Gilmore R, Solomon MR, Lipsitz A (1980) Social evolution and the emergence of leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 431–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb M (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1880) Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly 46: 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda T, Nakanishi D (2002) Cost-benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment. Evolution and Human Behavior 23: 373–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda T, Nakanishi D (2003) Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability? Rogers’ question revisited. Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 242–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima Y (2000a) Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 594–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima Y (2000b) Recovering Bartlett’s social psychology of cultural dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal JR, Laland KN (2000) Mathematical models for memetics. Journal of Memetics 4 (1). http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/2000/vol4/kendaLjr&laland_km.html

  • Kimura M (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera U, Niklas KJ (2004) The modern theory of biological evolution: An expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften 91: 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Brown GR (2002) Sense and Nonsense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Kumm J, Feldman MW (1995) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory: A test-case. Current Anthropology 36: 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck JB (1809). Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1980) Prologue: Some thoughts on the history of the evolutionary synthesis. In: The Evolutionary Synthesis (Mayr E, Provine W, eds), 1–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Provine W, eds (1980) The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath R, Lubell M, Richerson PJ, Waring TM, Baum W, Edsten E, Efferson C, Paciotti B (2005) Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 483–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A (2007a) Extended evolutionary theory makes human culture more amenable to evolutionary analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30.

  • Mesoudi A (2007b) Using the methods of social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology 1: 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A (in press) Foresight in cultural evolution. Biology and Philosophy.

  • Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2008) The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A (2004) The hierarchical transformation of event knowledge in human cultural transmission. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Dunbar RIM (2006a) A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology 97: 405–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2006b) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 329–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan LH (1877) Ancient Society. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller M (1870) The science of language. Nature 1: 256–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman FD (1995) Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity 60: 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols S (2002) On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science 69: 234–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL (2000) Applying Evolutionary Archaeology. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL (2002) Evolutionary archeology: Current status and future prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology 11: 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman M (2003) Niche Construction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the Levels of Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M, Mace R (2004) The cultural wealth of nations. Nature 428: 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski H (1994) The Evolution of Useful Things. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Rivers AL (1875) On the evolution of culture. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 4: 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin H, ed (1982) Learning, Development, and Culture: Essays in Evolutionary Epistemology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin H (2002) The Imagined World Made Real. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1979) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1947) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not By Genes Alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindos D (1985) Darwinian selection, symbolic variation, and the evolution of culture. Current Anthropology 26: 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (1995) The Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins M, Service E (1960) Evolution and Culture. Michigan: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter A, Sopher B (2003) Social learning and coordination conventions in intergenerational games: An experimental study. Journal of Political Economy 111: 498–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T, Mead M (1961) Micro- and macro-cultural models for cultural evolution. Anthropological Linguistics 3: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semon R (1921) The Mneme. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service ER (1975) Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan SJ (2002) Genes, Memes and Human History. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan SJ, Wilkinson JR (2001) Ceramic style change and neutral evolution: A case study from neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 66: 577–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and Mode in Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1995) Can group-functional behaviors evolve by cultural group selection? An empirical test. Current Anthropology 36: 473–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H (1896) The Principles of Sociology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2000) Why memes won’t do. In: Darwinizing Culture (Aunger R, ed), 163–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward J (1955) Theory of Culture Change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2003) Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor EB (1871) Primitive Culture. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD, Hopkins NH, Roberts JW, Weiner AM (1987) Molecular Biology of the Gene. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A (1883) Über die Vererbung. Jena: Gustav Fisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • White L (1959) The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Horner V, Litchfield C, Marshall-Pescini S (2004) How do apes ape? Learning and Behavior 32: 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1: 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J, ed (2000) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK

    Alex Mesoudi

Authors
  1. Alex Mesoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Mesoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesoudi, A. A Darwinian Theory of Cultural Evolution Can Promote an Evolutionary Synthesis for the Social Sciences. Biol Theory 2, 263–275 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.263

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.263

Keywords

Search

Navigation