Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biological and Cultural Evolution: Similar but Different

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abbott RJ, James JK, Milne RI, Gillies ACM (2003) Plant introductions, hybridization and gene flow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358: 1123–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley RA, Hahn MW, Shennan SJ (2004) Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1443–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley RA, Lipo CP, Herzog HA, Hahn MW (2007) Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying. Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley RA, Shennan SJ (2003) Cultural transmission and stochastic network growth. American Antiquity 68: 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulden M, Nunn CL, Towner MC (2006) Macroevolutionary studies of cultural trait transmission. Evolutionary Anthropology 15: 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1992) How microevolutionary processes give rise to history. In: History and Evolution. (Nitecki M, Nitecki DV, eds), 178–209. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2005) The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1975) On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist 30: 1103–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RL (2000) Towards a new evolutionary synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard M, Shennan S, Tehrani JJ (2006) Branching, blending, and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations. Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1968) The Origin of Species. London: Penguin. Orig. 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (2003) The Descent of Man. London: Gibson Square. Orig. 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (1999) Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284: 2124–2128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham WH (1992) Coevolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MW, Laland KN (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 453–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster P, Toth A (2003) Toward a phylogenetic chronology of ancient Gaulish, Celtic and Indo-European. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 9079–9084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabora L (2004) Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology and Philosophy 19: 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabora L (2005) Creative thought as a non-Darwinian evolutionary process. Journal of Creative Behavior 39: 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard RW, Kluckhohn C, Rapoport A (1956) Biological and cultural evolution: Some analogies and explorations. Behavioral Science 1: 6–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett B, De Silvestri A, Guglielmino CR (2002) Semes and genes in Africa. Current Anthropology 43: 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS (1955) Evolution, cultural and biological. Yearbook of Anthropology 2–25.

  • Ingold T (2000) The poverty of selectionism. Anthropology Today 16: 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2007) The trouble with “evolutionary biology.” Anthropology Today 23: 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb M (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1880) Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly 46: 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo CP, O’Brien MJ, Collard M, Shennan S, eds. (2006) Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace R, Holden C, Shennan S, eds. (2005) The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath R, Boyd R (2007) Mathematical Models of Social Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A (2007) Extended evolutionary theory makes human culture more amenable to evolutionary analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press).

  • Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2007) The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity (in press).

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 329–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller M (1870) The science of language. Nature 1: 256–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiman FD (1995) Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity 60: 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn CL, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Langley S (2006) Comparative methods for studying cultural trait evolution: A simulation study. Cross-Cultural Research 40: 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman M (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmagari K, Berkes F (1997) Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the Western James Bay Cree women of subarctic Canada. Human Ecology 25: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Rivers AL (1875) On the evolution of culture. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 4: 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not By Genes Alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede F (2007) Maglemosian memes: Technological ontology, craft traditions and the evolution of northern European barbed points. In: Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies (O’Brien MJ, ed). Washington, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera MC, Lake JA (2004) The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431: 152–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salganik M, Dodds P, Watts D (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311: 854–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Claidière N (2006) Why modeling cultural evolution is still such a challenge. Biological Theory 1: 20–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tëmkin I, Eldredge N (2007) Phylogenetics and material cultural evolution. Current Anthropology 48: 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanPool TL, Palmer CT, VanPool CS (2007) Horned serpents, tradition, and the tapestry of culture. In: Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies (O’Brien MJ, ed). Washington, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Alex Mesoudi

Authors
  1. Alex Mesoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Mesoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesoudi, A. Biological and Cultural Evolution: Similar but Different. Biol Theory 2, 119–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.119

Keywords

Search

Navigation