Skip to main content
Log in

Freedom and insanity

  • Psychiatry and Freedom
  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper describes the refusal of the liberal community to assert the right of persons accused of mental illness to be free of coercive psychiatric intrusion. It suggests that the penchant for benevolent governmental intrusion into other social problems may be at fault and recommends that intervention be abandoned in favor of a return to human autonomy as a basis of the concept of freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Alexander, George and Szasz, Thomas, ‘From contract to status via psychiatry’,Santa Clara Lawyer 13 (1973), 537–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US 254, 1970.

  • Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45, 1905.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, G.J. Freedom and insanity. Metamedicine 3, 343–350 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00900936

Key words

Navigation