Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T19:16:21.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idealist Panpsychism and Spacetime Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2023

DAMIAN ALEKSIEV Open the ORCID record for DAMIAN ALEKSIEV [Opens in a new window]
DAMIAN ALEKSIEV*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA aleksiev.damian@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a novel argument against one theoretically attractive form of panpsychism. I argue that ‘idealist panpsychism’ is false because it cannot account for spacetime's structure. Idealist panpsychists posit that fundamental reality is purely experiential. Moreover, they posit that consciousness at the fundamental level metaphysically grounds and explains both the facts of physics and the facts of human consciousness. I argue that if idealist panpsychism is true, human consciousness and consciousness at the fundamental level will have the same metrical structure. However, as I demonstrate, human consciousness does not exhibit the same metrical structure as spacetime. Consequently, the idealist panpsychist faces an explanatory gap between the fundamental consciousness she posits and spacetime. Idealist panpsychism is incompatible with the existence of such an explanatory gap. Thus, idealist panpsychists must either close this explanatory gap (which I argue they lack the resources to do), or idealist panpsychism is false.

Keywords

panpsychismspacetimeexplanatory gapgroundingidealismphilosophy of mindmetaphysics
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , First View , pp. 1 - 22
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am especially grateful to Philip Goff for his comments and many invaluable discussions on panpsychism. Many thanks also to Miri Albahari, Hanoch Ben-Yami, Tim Crane, Zhiwei Gu, Aditya Jha, Joel Katzav, Hedda Hassel Mørch, Howard Robinson, the audiences at Utrecht University (10th European Congress of Analytic Philosophy) and at the University of Kent (94th Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and the Mind Association), and all the anonymous referees for their helpful feedback.

References

Aleksiev, Damian. (2021) ‘Missing Entities: Has Panpsychism Lost the Physical World?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28, 194–211. https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.28.9.194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim, and Chalmers, David J.. (2003) ‘What is the Unity of Consciousness?’ In Cleeremans, A. and Frith, C. (eds.), The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration, Dissociation (New York: Oxford University Press), 23–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned. (2007) ‘Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh between Psychology and Neuroscience’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 481–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, Ned. (2011) ‘Perceptual Consciousness Overflows Cognitive Access’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 567–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, David J. (1996) The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. (2015) ‘Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism’. In Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. (eds.), Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism (New York: Oxford University Press), 246–76.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. (2020) ‘Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem’. In Seager, W. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (New York: Routledge), 353–73.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J., and Jackson, Frank. (2001) ‘Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation’. Philosophical Review, 110, 315–61. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-3-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dainton, Barry. (2000) Stream of Consciousness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro. (2000) ‘Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism’. Foundations of Physics, 30, 1605–28 https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026442015519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip. (2017) Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip. (2019) Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. London: Rider.Google Scholar
Goff, Philip. (2021) ‘Putting Consciousness First: Replies to Critics’. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28, 289–328. https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.28.9.289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip. (2022) ‘Quantum Mechanics and the Consciousness Constraint’. In Gao, S. (ed.), Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics (New York: Oxford University Press), 117–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip. (Forthcoming) ‘How Exactly does Panpsychism Help Explain Consciousness?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies. https://www.philipgoffphilosophy.com/uploads/1/4/4/4/14443634/how_exactly_does_panpsychism_help_explain_consciousness_jcs.pdf.Google Scholar
Kastrup, Bernardo. (2018) ‘The Universe in Consciousness’. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25, 125–55.Google Scholar
Lee, Andrew Y. (2019) ‘The Microstructure of Experience’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5, 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2019.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Andrew Y. (2021) ‘Modeling Mental Qualities’. Philosophical Review, 130, 263–98. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-8809919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ney, Alyssa, and Albert, David Z., eds. (2013) The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, Luke. (2014) ‘What are the Dimensions of the Conscious Field?’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21, 88–104.Google Scholar
Roelofs, Luke. (2019) Combining Minds: How to Think about Composite Subjectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. (1927) The Analysis of Matter. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (2006a) ‘Panpsychism?: Reply to Commentators with a Celebration of Descartes’. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13, 184–280.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (2006b) ‘Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism’. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13, 3–31.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (2015) ‘Real Materialism (with new postscript)’. In Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. (eds.), Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism (New York: Oxford University Press), 161–208.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (2020) ‘What Does ‘Physical’ Mean? A Prolegomenon to Physicalist Panpsychism’. In Seager, William (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (New York: Routledge), 327–39.Google Scholar
Wagner, Mark. (2006) The Geometries of Visual Space. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Worrall, John. (1989) ‘Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?’ Dialectica, 43, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar