Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:33:23.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heisenberg Meets Kuhn: Closed Theories and Paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Alisa Bokulich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine in detail the similarities and dissimilarities between Werner Heisenberg's account of closed theories and Thomas Kuhn's model of scientific revolutions. My analysis draws on a little-known discussion that took place between Heisenberg and Kuhn in 1963, in which Heisenberg, having just read Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions, compares Kuhn's views to his own account of closed theories. I conclude that while Heisenberg and Kuhn share a holist conception of theories, a revolutionary model of theory change, and even a notion of incommensurability, their views diverge fundamentally when it comes to the issue of scientific realism. I show that, contrary to popular opinion, Heisenberg is not an instrumentalist, but rather a pluralistic realist.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 90 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2004 meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. I would like to thank Mélanie Frappier for many stimulating discussions about Heisenberg's closed theories, as well as the editor and a blind referee for many helpful comments. Much of the research for this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. SES-0240328, and I would also like to thank Boston University's Humanities Foundation for support while this paper was completed. I am also grateful to Michael Leach of Harvard University's Physics Research Library for permission to quote from the Archive for the History of Quantum Physics.

References

Beller, Mara (1999), Quantum Dialogue: The Making of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa (2004), “Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Quantum Mechanics”, Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Quantum Mechanics 35:377–396.Google Scholar
Bokulich, Peter, and Bokulich, Alisa (2005), “Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics”, Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics 35:347–371.Google Scholar
Born, Max, and Heisenberg, Werner ([1927] 1928), “La mécanique des quanta”, in Électrons et photons: Rapports et discissions du cinquième Conseil de Physique tenu a Bruxelles du 24 au 29 octobre 1927 sous les auspices de l’Institut International de Physique Solvay. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 143–184.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, David (1992), Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg. New York: Freeman Press.Google Scholar
Chevalley, Catherine (1988), “Physical Reality and Closed Theories in Werner Heisenberg’s Early Papers”, in Batens, D. and van Bendegem, J. P. (eds.), Theory and Experiment: Recent Insights and New Perspectives on Their Relation. Dordrecht: Reidel, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frappier, Mélanie (2004), Heisenberg’s Notion of Interpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1925), “Über Quantentheoretische Umdeutun Kinematischer und Mechanischer Beziehungen”, Über Quantentheoretische Umdeutun Kinematischer und Mechanischer Beziehungen 33:879–893.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1927] 1983), “The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics”, in Wheeler, John Archibald and Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement. Reprint. Translated by John Archibald Wheeler and Wojciech Hubert Zurek. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 62–84.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1934] 1979), “Recent Changes in the Foundations of Exact Science”, in Hayes, F. C. (trans.), Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 11–26.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1935] 1979), “Questions of Principle in Modern Physics”, in Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics. Lecture delivered at Vienna University on November 27, 1935. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 41–52.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1942] 1998), Philosophie: Le manuscrit de 1942. Translated by Catherine Chevalley. Originally a 1942 typewritten manuscript, later published as Ordnung der Wirklichkeit (Munich: Piper-Verlag, 1989). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1948] 1974), “The Notion of a ‘Closed Theory’ in Modern Science”, in Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper & Row, 39–46. Originally published as “Der Begriff ‘Abgeschlossene Theorie’ in der Modernen Naturwissenschaft”, Dialectica 2:331–336.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1958a), Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1958b] 1974), “Planck’s Discovery and the Philosophical Problems of Atomic Theory”, in Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper and Row, 8–29.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (February 27, 1963), Interview of Werner Heisenberg by Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge, MA: Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, deposit at Harvard University.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (February 28, 1963), Interview of Werner Heisenberg by Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge, MA: Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, deposit at Harvard University.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1966), “Die Rolle der Phänomenologischen Theorien im System der Theoretischen Physik”, in De-Shalit, A., Feshbach, H., and Hove, L. Van (eds.) Preludes in Theoretical Physics: In Honor of V. F. Weisskopf. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 166–169.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1968), “Theory, Criticism and a Philosophy”, in From a Life of Physics: Evening Lectures at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy. Vienna: IAEA, 31–46.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1969] 1990), “Changes of Thought Pattern in the Progress of Science”, in Peter Heath (trans.) Across the Frontiers. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press, 154–165.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1971a), “Atomic Physics and Pragmatism”, in Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. New York: Harper and Row, 93–102.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1971b), “Positivism, Metaphysics, and Religion”, in Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. New York: Harper and Row, 205–217.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner ([1972] 1983), “The Correctness-Criteria for Closed Theories in Physics”, in Encounters with Einstein: And Other Essays on People, Places, and Particles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 123–129.Google Scholar
Howard, Don (2004), “Who Invented the Copenhagen Interpretation? A Study in Mythology”, Who Invented the Copenhagen Interpretation? A Study in Mythology 71:669–682.Google Scholar
Jammer, Max (1974), The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas ([1962] 1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (February 27, 1963), Interview of Werner Heisenberg by Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge, MA: Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, deposit at Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (February 28, 1963), Interview of Werner Heisenberg by Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge, MA: Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, deposit at Harvard University.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1984), “A Case for Scientific Realism”, in Leplin, Jarrett (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl ([1963] 1989), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheibe, Erhard ([1988] 2001), “The Physicists' Conception of Progress”, in Falkenburg, Brigitte (ed), Between Rationalism and Empiricism: Selected Papers in the Philosophy of Physics. New York: Springer Verlag, 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar