Rahner presents an example of an ambivalent stance towards human materiality. the essay provides a discussion of rahner's use of the concept of materiality in his metaphysics of human knowledge and shows that rahner's anthropology contains two arguments which define the limitations of human materiality in different ways. one of these arguments affirms that human materiality is essential and good, whereas the other stand seems to deny the goodness and the permanence of human materiality.
CITATION STYLE
Allik, T. (1985). Karl Rahner on Materiality and Human Knowledge. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 49(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1985.0015
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.