Skip to main content
Log in

The Meaning of ‘Other’ in Classifications: Formal Methods Meet Artistic Research

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary is a reflection on a collaboration with the artist Rossella Biscotti and comments on how artistic research and logico-mathematical methods can be used to contribute to the development of critical perspectives on contemporary data practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. “The enthusiasm for numerical data is reflected by the US census. (…) Printing numbers was a surface effect. Behind, it lays new technologies for classifying and enumerating and new bureaucracies with the authority and continuity to deploy the technology. (…) Categories had to be invented into which people could conveniently fall in order to be counted. (…) Statistical laws that look like brute, irreducible facts were first found in human affairs, but they could be noticed only after social phenomena had been enumerated, tabulated, and made public.” (Hacking 1990: 2–3).

  2. In a lecture given at the 2012 summer school on “Images and Visualisation: Imaging Technology, Truth and Trust”, in Norrköping, Sweden, Anne Beaulieu makes a similar point with respect to how artists in residence can force other kinds of discussions and challenge existing conventions within information visualisation.

References

  • Biscotti, R., Reist, J., and Allo, P. (2017). OTHER. By Rossella Biscotti. The Online Journal of CONTOUR BIENNALE. Retrieved on 3 June 2017 from http://hearings.contour8.be/2017/05/15/other/.

  • Braun, M. (1992). Picturing time: the work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Christin, Angèle. (2016). From daguerreotypes to algorithms: machines, expertise, and three forms of objectivity. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 46(1), 27–32.

  • Daston, L., and Galison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations, 40, 81–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2008). The method of levels of abstraction. Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holzhey, M.R. ed. (2014). Rossella Biscotti—10 X 10. Kunstmuseum Krefeld/Museum Haus Esters—Revolver Publishing.

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.

  • Leonelli, S., Rappert, B., and Davies, G. (2016). Data shadows: knowledge, openness, and absence. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2): 191–202.

  • Stigler, S.M., (2016). The seven pillars of statistical wisdom. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

  • Tempini, N. and Leonelli, S. (2016). Exhibition: live by data, die by data. Nature Physics, 12(2), 109–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B. (2011). Up and down the ladder of abstraction [webpage]. Retrieved on 3 June 2017 from http://worrydream.com/LadderOfAbstraction/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Allo.

Additional information

This commentary is an extended version of blog posts previously published on www.logicandinformation.be and www.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/tag/logivis/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allo, P. The Meaning of ‘Other’ in Classifications: Formal Methods Meet Artistic Research. Philos. Technol. 30, 541–545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0272-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0272-4

Keywords

Navigation