Skip to main content
Log in

A Generalization of the Łukasiewicz Algebras

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce the variety ℒ n m, m ≥ 1 and n ≥ 2, of m-generalized Łukasiewicz algebras of order n and characterize its subdirectly irreducible algebras. The variety ℒ n m is semisimple, locally finite and has equationally definable principal congruences. Furthermore, the variety ℒ n m contains the variety of Łukasiewicz algebras of order n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balbes, R., and P. Dwinger, Distributive Lattices, University of Missouri Press, 1974.

  2. Berman, J., ‘Distributive lattices with an additional unary operation’, Aequationes Math. 16 (1977), 165-171.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burris, S., and H. P. Sankappanavar, A Course in Universal Algebra, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Day, A., ‘A note on the congruence extension property’, Algebra Universalis 1 (1971), 234-235.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KÖhler, P., and D. Pigozzi, ‘Varieties with equationally definable principal congruences’, Algebra Universalis 11 (1980), 213-219.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Urquhart, A., ‘Distributive lattices with a dual homomorphic operation’, Studia Logica 38 (1979), 201-209.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vaz De Carvalho, J., ‘The subvariety K 2,0 of Ockham algebras’, Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège 53 (1984), 393-400.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vaz De Carvalho, J., ‘Congruences on algebras of К n,o ’, Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège 54 (1985), 301-303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almada, T., Vaz de Carvalho, J. A Generalization of the Łukasiewicz Algebras. Studia Logica 69, 329–338 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013846725213

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013846725213

Navigation