Skip to main content
Log in

Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we argue that puzzle of tax compliance can be explained, at least in part, by recognizing the typically neglected role of ethics in individual behavior; that is, individuals do not always behave as the selfish, rational, self-interested individuals portrayed in the standard neoclassical paradigm, but rather are often motivated by many other factors that have as their main foundation some aspects of “ethics.” We argue that it is not possible to understand fully an individual’s compliance decisions without considering in some form these ethical dimensions. Specifically, we argue here that there is much direct and indirect evidence that ethics differ across individuals and that these differences matter in significant ways for their compliance decisions. We then put this in the larger context of the inability of the standard neoclassical paradigm to explain compliance of at least some individuals, and we suggest several possible avenues by which theory can be expanded to incorporate ethics. We conclude by arguing that a full house of compliance strategies is needed to combat tax evasion, strategies that include the traditional “enforcement” paradigm suggested by and consistent with neoclassical theory, a less traditional “service” paradigm that recognizes the important role of a “kinder and gentler” tax administration in encouraging compliance, and, importantly, a new “trust” paradigm that is built on the foundation of ethics, in which the tax administration must recognize that it can erode the ethics of taxpayers by its own decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A.: 1980, ‘A Theory of Social Custom of Which Unemployment May Be One Consequence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 749-795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allingham, M. G. and A. Sandmo: 1972 ‘Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis’, Journal of Public Economics 1, 323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J.: 1999, ‘Tax Compliance and Administration’, in W. B. Hildreth and J. A. Richardson (eds.), Handbook on Taxation (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 741-768).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., B. R. Jackson, and M. McKee: 1993, ‘Fiscal Exchange, Collective Decision Institutions, and Tax Compliance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22, 285-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. and S. Jacobson: 2007, ‘Using Laboratory Experiments in Public Economics’, National Tax Journal 60, 129-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., G. H. McClelland and W. D. Schulze: 1992, ‘Why Do People Pay Taxes?’, Journal of Public Economics 48, 21–38.

  • Alm, J., G. H. McClelland, and W. D. Schulze: 1999, ‘Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting’, KYKLOS 48, 141-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., I. Sanchez, and A. De Juan: 1995, ‘Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance’, KYKLOS 48, 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. and B. Torgler: 2006, ‘Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and Europe’, Journal of Economic Psychology 27, 224-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein: 1998: ‘Tax Compliance,’ The Journal of Economic Literature 36, 818-860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S.: 1968, ‘Crime and Punishment – An Economic Approach’, The Journal of Political Economy 76, 169-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, M.: 1998, ‘Tax Evasion and Orders of Risk Aversion’, Journal of Public Economics 67, 123-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. M., J. Martinez-Vazquez, and B. Torgler: 2008, ‘Tax Effort in Developing Countries and High Income Countries: The Impact of Corruption, Voice, and Accountability’, Economic Analysis & Policy 38, 55-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, M., C. Christian, and J. Slemrod: 2001, ‘Do Normative Appeals Affect Tax Compliance? Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota’, National Tax Journal 54, 125-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, L. and L. Mittone: 1997, ‘Tax Evasion and Moral Constraints: Some Experimental Evidence’, KYKLOS 50, 297-324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S.: 2006, Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution (Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton,NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, K.A., S. Kverndokk, and K. Nyborg: 2003: ‘An Economic Model of Moral Motivation’, Journal of Public Economics 87, 1967-1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T.: 1983, ‘Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 65, 363-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F.: 1990, Cheating the Government: The Economics of Evasion (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G., J. Martinez-Vazquez, M. McKee, and B. Torgler: 2009, ‘Tax Morale Affects Tax Compliance: Evidence from Survey and an Artefactual Field Experiment’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70, 447-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Boétie, é.: 1997, The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude (Black Rose Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J. A.: 2007, ‘Criminal Investigation Enforcement Activities and Taxpayer Noncompliance’, Public Finance Review 35, 500-529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J.A., M. J. Graetz, and L. L. Wilde: 1990, ‘The Effect of Audit Rates on the Federal Individual Income Tax, 1977-1986’, National Tax Journal 43, 395-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J.A. and L.L. Wilde: 1988, ‘An Empirical Analysis of Federal Income Tax Auditing and Compliance’, National Tax Journal 41, 61-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elffers, H.: 1991. Income Tax Evasion: Theory and Measurement (Kluwer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erard, B. and J. S. Feinstein: 1994, ‘The Role of Moral Sentiments and Audit Perceptions in Tax Compliance’, Public Finance 49, 70-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, J.S.: 2007: ‘Review of The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce’, The Journal of Economic Literature 45, 466-479

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P. and B. S. Frey: 2002, ‘Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers are Treated’, Economics of Governance 3, 87-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. and B. Torgler: 2007, ‘Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation’, Journal of Comparative Economics 35, 136-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. P. F.: 1989, ‘Individual Morality and Reputation Costs as Deterrents to Tax Evasion’, European Economic Review 33, 797-805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1996, Full House (Harmony Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, M. J. and L. L. Wilde: 1985, ‘The Economics of Tax Compliance: Fact and Fantasy’, National Tax Journal 38, 355-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasseldine, J., P. Hite, S. James, and M. Toumi: 2007, ‘Persuasive Communication: Tax Compliance Enforcement Strategies for Sole Proprietors’, Contemporary Accounting Research 24, 171-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury: 1978, A Dictionary of Compliance Factors (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A.Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica 47, 263-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 2000, Choices, Values, and Frames (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J. J.: 1975, ‘Macroeconomic Constraints, Economic Efficiency and Ethics: an Introduction to Kantian Economics’, Economica 42, 430-437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. and J. A. List: 2007, ‘What Do Laboratory Experiments Reveal About the Real World?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 , 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.: 1987, ‘Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 121-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, J. and M. Rider: 1995, ‘Multiple Modes of Evasion: Theory and Evidence,’ National Tax Journal 58, 51-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N.: 2006, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL and London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W.: 1996, ‘When Is Tax Evasion Unethical?’, Working Paper, Policy Analysis No. 11, International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc.

  • McGee, R. W.: 2006, ‘Three Views on the Ethics of Tax Evasion’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 15-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. W., S. S. M. Ho, and A. Y. S. Li: 2008, ‘A Comparative Study on Perceived Ethics of Tax Evasion: Hong Kong Vs the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 77, 147-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, G. B.: 1998, ‘Preference and Utility’, in S. Barberà, P. J. Hammond, and C. Seidl (eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1-47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, G. D. and R. A. Naylor: 1996, ‘A Model of Tax Evasion with Group Conformity and Social Custom’, European Journal of Political Economy 12, 49-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R. A.: 1989, ‘Strikes, Free Riders and Social Customs’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 771-805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostling, R.: 2009, ‘Economic Influences on Moral Values’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 9(1), Article 2.

  • Roth, A. E.: 1987, ‘Laboratory Experimentation in Economics’, in T. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 269-299).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and D. Enste: 2000, ‘Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences’, The Journal of Economic Literature 38, 77-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. and S. Yitzhaki: 2002, ‘Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration’, in A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, and New York, 1423-1470).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. and T. E. Yarbrough: 1978, ‘Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey’, Public Administration Review 38, 442-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1984, ‘Reciprocity: the Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions’, Economic Journal 94, 772-787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B.: 2002, ‘Speaking to Theorists and Searching for Facts: Tax Morale and Tax Compliance in Experiments’, Journal of Economic Surveys 16, 657-684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B.: 2004, ‘Moral Suasion: An Alternative Tax Policy Strategy? Evidence from a Controlled Field Experiment in Switzerland’, Economics of Governance 5, 235-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B.: 2005, ‘Tax Morale and Direct Democracy’, European Journal of Political Economy 21, 525-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B.: 2007, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. and F. Schneider: 2007. ‘Shadow Economy, Tax Morale, Governance and Institutional Quality: A Panel Analysis’, School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 210, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.

  • Torgler, B. and C. A. Schaltegger: 2005. ‘Tax Amnesties and Political Participation’, Public Finance Review 33, 403-431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V.J.: 1994, ‘Morality and Economics: De Moribus est Disputandum’, in V.J. Vanberg (ed.), Rules and Choice in Economics (Routledge, London, UK and New York, NY, 41-59).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Webley, P., H.S.J. Robben, H. Elffers, and D.J. Hessing: 1991, Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A.D. and D.F. Woodbury: 1985, ‘The Effect of Tax Laws and Tax Administration on Tax Compliance’, National Tax Journal 38, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, Skelly, and White, Inc.: 1984, ‘Taxpayer Attitudes Survey: Final Report’, Public Opinion Survey Prepared for the Public Affairs Division, Internal Revenue Service, New York, NY, December 1984.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Alm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alm, J., Torgler, B. Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. J Bus Ethics 101, 635–651 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9

Keywords

Navigation