Skip to main content
Log in

Is it the Kids or the Schedule?: The Incremental Effect of Families and Flexible Scheduling on Perceived Career Success

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexible work arrangements (FWAs) are widely offered in public accounting as a tool to retain valued professional staff. Previous research has shown that participants in FWAs are perceived to be less likely to succeed in their careers in public accounting than individuals in public accounting who do not participate in FWAs (Cohen and Single, 2001). Research has also documented an increasing backlash against family–friendly policies in the workplace as placing unfair burdens on individuals without children. Building directly on a previous study in this journal (Cohen and Single, 2001), this study addresses the issue of whether the documented perceptions toward FWA participants are the result of electing to take part in the FWA or the result of bias against employees with children. The research questions are addressed in a 3 × 2 experimental setting in which we manipulate FWA participation, along with family status and gender of a hypothetical manager in a public accounting firm. Our findings indicate that FWA participants are viewed as less likely to advance and as less committed than individuals without children or individuals who had children but who were not taking part in a FWA. Male FWA participants are viewed as less likely to succeed than female FWA participants. This effect appears to arise from a perception that FWA participants are willing to make sacrifices in their careers to accommodate family needs and thus may not be as committed to making the sacrifices perceived as necessary to meet the rigorous demands of the public accounting environment. This raises the ethical question of what could be done to change the culture in public accounting to foster a substantive support system for individuals who want to balance a family and a career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I.: 1988, Attitudes, Personality and Behavior (Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen T. D., J. E. A. Russell and M. C. Rush: 1994, The effects of gender and leave of absence on attributions for high performance, perceived organizational com-mitment, and allocation of organizational rewards. Sex Roles, 3(78), 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allerton, H. E.: 2000, Parental backlash. Training and Development 54(11), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D., J. R. Hopper and S. E. Kaplan: 1998, The effect of diversity-related attributes on hiring, advancement and voluntary turnover judgments. Accounting Horizons 12(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D. and S. E. Kaplan: 2000, Myths and realities of flexible work arrangements. The CPA Journal, LXX(4), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D. and S. E. Kaplan: 2002, The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout andbehavioral job outcomes. Behavioral Research in Accounting 14, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D., J. Cohen and L. Single: 2003, Determi-nants of intentions of auditors to adopt flexible work arrangements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (March): 69–91.

  • American Association for Single People. www.single-rights. com

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.: 2002, The Practicing CPA. January.

  • Anderson, J. C., E. N. Johnson and P. J. J. Reckers: 1994, Perceived effects of gender, family structure and physical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1, 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R.: 1997, Flexible scheduling in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Education (Winter) 145–158.

  • Cohen, J. R., L. Pant and D. Sharp: 1998, The effect of gender and academic discipline diversity on the ethical evaluations, ethical intentions and ethical orientations of potential public accounting recruits. Accounting Horizons (September), 250–270.

  • Cohen, J. R. and L. E. Single: 2001, An examination of the perceived impact of flexible work arrangements on professional opportunities in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. M.: 1993, Stress and departures from the public accounting profession: A study of gender dif-ference. Accounting Horizons (May), 29–38.

  • Cook, J. M.: 1999, End paper! Doing the right thing. Hermes (Spring), 36.

  • Copeland, J.: 2002, Integrity and quality begin with people. Dallas Friday Group, Dallas, Texas (October 11). http://www.deloitte.com/vc/0,1639,cid%3D59-505,00.html.

  • Dalton, D. R., J. W. Hill and R. J. Ramsay: 1997, Women as managers and partners: Context specific predictors of turnover in international public accounting firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 16(1), 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.: 1997, Profiting from scheduling alternatives. Journal of Accountancy (November), 87–93.

  • Fogarty, T. J.: 1992, Organizational socialization in accounting firms: A theoretical framework and agenda for future research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(2), 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, T. J.: 2000, Socialization and organizational outcomes in large public accounting firms. Journal of Managerial Issues 12, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune: 2001. Best companies to work for. http:// www.fortune.com/lists/bestcompanies/index.html Accessed 6/5/02.

  • Grandey, A. A.: 2001. in R.Cropanzano(ed.) Justice in the workplace: Applications, Vol. 2 (Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. and T. Mitchell: 1979, Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L.: 1991, Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, K. L.: 1992, Gender effects and labor supply in public accounting: An agenda of research issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3/4), 343–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, K. L.: 1996, Diversity, family issues and the big 6. Journal of Accountancy (July), 51–56.

  • Hooks, K. L., P. Thomas and W. Stout: 1997, Retention of women in public accounting. Advances in Accounting, 15, 17–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, K. L. and J. L. Higgs: 2002, Changing environ-ment and productivity relationships in professional services firms.'' Behavioral Research in Accounting 14, 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, K. L. and P. Thomas: 2002. The view from in-side: Employee perceptions of the large professional services firms. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 9, 65–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N., D. J. Lowe and P. M. J. Reckers: 1996, An examination of direct and indirect gender effects in public accounting. Advances in Accounting 14, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N., S. Kaplan and P. M. J. Reckers: 1998, An examination of potential gender-based differences in audit managers' performance evaluation judgements. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10, 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. N., D. J. Lowe and P. M. J. Reckers: 2000, A new culture? Evidence of support for diversity in public accounting performance evalua-tion judgments. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 3, 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E., P. Flynn and D. Kellogg.: 1998, Customized work arrangements in the public accounting profes-sion. Working paper, Bentley College.

  • Lowe, D. J., P. M. J. Reckers, and D. Sanders: 2001, The influence of gender, ethnicity, and individual differences on perceptions of career progression in public accounting. International Journal of Auditing, 5, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner: 1990, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd Edition (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R. and E. Sunstrom: 1989, Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psycho-logical Bulletin 105(1), 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, M. F. and D. M. Fernandes: 1992, Social desirability bias in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly 7, 871–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothausen, T. J., J. A. Gonzalez, N. E. Clarke and L. L. O'Dell: 1998, Family-friendly backlash-Fact or fiction? The case of organizations' on-site child care centers. Personnel Psychology 51, 685–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, D.: 1999, Who needs family-friendly compa-nies? Forbes 163(1), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenbarger, S.: 2001a, Providing flexible schedules is challenging for managers. The Wall Street Journal (January 17, 2001), B1.

  • Shellenbarger, S.: 2001b, This time, firms see work-life plans as aid during the downturn. The Wall Street Journal (March 28), B1.

  • Trapp, M. W., R. H. Hermanson and D. H. Turner: 1989, Current perceptions of issues related to women employed in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 3(1), 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J.: 2001, The daddy track: Men who take family leave may get frowned upon at the office. Psychology Today 34(5), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Mother: 2001, Best 100 companies for working mothers. http://www.workingwoman.com/oct2001/100_best. shtml}. Accessed 6/5/02.

  • Working Mother: 2002, Make room for daddy. http:// www.workingwoman.com/makeroom.shtml. Acces-sed 10/29/02.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almerm, E.D., Cohen, J.R. & Single, L.E. Is it the Kids or the Schedule?: The Incremental Effect of Families and Flexible Scheduling on Perceived Career Success. Journal of Business Ethics 54, 51–65 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043496.47644.38

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043496.47644.38

Navigation