Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Post-restatement Actions Taken by a Firm on Non-professional Investors’ Credibility Perceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency of earnings restatements has been increasing over the last decade. Restating previous earnings erodes perceived trustworthiness and competence of management, giving firms strong incentives to take actions to enhance perceived credibility of future financial reports [Farber, D. B.: 2005, The Accounting Review 80(2), 539–561.]. Using an experimental case, we examine the ability of post-restatement actions taken by a firm to positively influence non-professional investors’ perceptions of management’s financial reporting credibility. Our examination considers credibility judgments following two types of restatements – those resulting from fraud in which the character, ethics, and values of an organization may be called into question [cf. Copeland, Jr., J. E.: 2005, Accounting Horizons 19(1), 35–43.], and those resulting from non-fraud (i.e., aggressive accounting).

Based on the information in the experimental case, non-professional investors take the role of potential equity investors and make a judgment about management’s financial reporting credibility after reviewing a set of post-restatement actions taken by a firm. The possible actions include changes in four corporate governance mechanisms (i.e., internal audit function, external audit firm, board of directors, CFO) and a buyback of company stock. Our results provide an important contribution to the literature by demonstrating that among non-professional investors, perceptions of management’s financial reporting credibility are affected both by the post-restatement action taken and the nature of the restatement. These results offer insight into the formation of a key credibility judgment made by non-professional investors following a trust-destroying event, an earnings restatement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aier J., Comprix J., Gunlock M., Lee D. 2005. The Financial Expertise of CFOs and Accounting. Accounting Horizons 19(3): 123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almer E. D., Hopper J. R., Kaplan S. E. 1998. The Effect of Diversity Related Attributes on Hiring, Advancement and Voluntary Turnover Judgments. Accounting Horizons 12(1): 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. and T. L. Yohn: 2002, The Effect of 10 K Restatements on Firm Value, Information Asymmetries, and Investors’ Reliance on Earnings (September). http://ssrn.com/abstract=332380

  • Antoine, R.: 2004, Internal Audit: Spotlight Shines on its␣New Role. http://accounting.smartpros.com/x45449.xml

  • Arjoon S. 2006. Striking a Balance Between Rules and Principles-Based Approaches for Effective Governance: A Risks-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 68(1): 53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badrinath S. G., Varaiya N. P., Ferling R. L. 2001. Share Repurchase: To Buy or Not to Buy. Financial Executive 17(3): 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber B. M., Odean T. 2002. Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First? The Review of Financial Studies 15(2): 455–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley M. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71(4): 443–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker C., Defond M., Jiambalvo J., Subramanyam K. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrus, A., M. McNamee, P. Dwyer, M. Vickers, and D. Henry: 2002, What Cleanup? As Washington Dithers, Financial Reform is Going Nowhere Fast. Business Week (June 17), 26.

  • Carlson D. S., P. L. Perrewe 1995. Institutionalization of Organizational Ethics through Transformational Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 14(10): 829–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Krishnamoorthy G., Wright A. 2004. The Corporate Governance Mosaic and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Literature 23: 87–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board: 2003, The Commission on Public Trust and Private Enterprise: Findings and Recommendations. (The Conference Board, New York, NY).

  • Copeland J. E. Jr. 2005. Ethics as an Imperative. Accounting Horizons 19(1): 35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel K., Hirshleifer D., Teoh S. H. 2002. Investor Psychology in Capital Markets: Evidence and Policy Implications. Journal of Monetary Economy 49(1): 139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann L. Y. 1981, Common Stock Repurchases: An Analysis of Returns to Bondholders and Stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 9(2): 113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, A. P. Sweeney: 1996, ‹Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC’, Contemporary Accounting Research 13(Spring), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai H., Hogan C. E., Wilkins M. S. 2006. The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting: Earnings Restatements and Management Turnover. The Accounting Review 81(1): 83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W. B., F. D. Hodge, S. J. Kennedy, and M. Pronk: 2007, ‹Are MBA Students a Good Proxy for Non-professional Investors?’, The Accounting Review (forthcoming).

  • Farber D. B. 2005. Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter? The Accounting Review 80(2): 539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellingham, J. C. and D. P. Newman: 1985, ‹Strategic Considerations in Auditing’, The Accounting Review (October), 634–650.

  • General Accounting Office (GAO): 2002, Report 03-138 Financial Statement Restatements: Trends, Market Impacts, Regulatory Responses and Remaining Challenges (Washington DC: GAO).

  • Gramling A. A., Maletta M. J., Schneider A., Church B. K. 2004. The Role of Tile Internal Audit Function in Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of the Extant Internal Auditing Literature and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Accounting Literature 23: 194–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling, A. A. and D. N. Stone: 2001, ‹Audit Firm Industry Expertise: A Review and Synthesis of the Archival Literature’, Journal of Accounting Literature 20, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward M. L. A., Rindova V. P., Pollock T. G. 2004. Believing One’s Own Press. The Causes and Consequences of CEO Celebrity. Strategic Management Journal 25: 637–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. 1995. The Challenges of Investor Communication: The Case of CUC International Inc Journal of Financial Economics 38(2): 111–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D. E., L. Koonce, and J. Miller: 1999, ‹The Joint Effect of Management’s Prior Forecast Accuracy and the Form of its Financial Forecasts on Investor Judgments’, Journal of Accounting Research 37(supplement), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hribar P., Jenkins N. T. 2006. The Effect of Accounting Restatements on Earnings Revisions and the Estimated Cost of Capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9: 3337–3356

    Google Scholar 

  • James, K. L.: 2003, ‹The Effects of Internal Audit Structure on Perceived Financial Statement Fraud Prevention’, Accounting Horizons 17(December), 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings R. 1987. Unsystematic Security Price Movements, Management Earnings Forecasts, and Revisions in Consensus Analyst Earnings Forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 25(1): 90–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch R. J., Leather P. E., Snead K. C. 1993. Student Versus Recruiter Perceptions of Staff Auditor Performance Variables. Accounting Horizons 7(4): 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer M. 2004. How Do Investors Assess the Credibility of Management Disclosures? Accounting Horizons 18(3): 185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbournn T. 2002. CEO Reputation and Stock-based Compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 68(2): 233–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, D. S. and J. Stoeckenius: 1979, ‹Auditing: Incentives and Truthful Reporting’, Journal of Accounting Research 17(Supplement), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Z. V., V. J. Richardson, and S. Scholz: 2004, ‹Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 37(1), 59, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockness H., J. Rockness 2005. Legislated Ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley, the Impact on Corporate America. Journal of Business Ethics 57(1):31–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. 1998. Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review 23: 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C.: 2003, Xerox: New Lease on Life. CFO.com. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did= 424114141&Fmt=3&clientId=16627&RQT=309& VName=PQD. Accessed 12/18/06

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): 2001, Revision of the Commission’s auditor independence requirements, final rule S7-13-00 (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

  • Shleifer, A., and L. H. Summers: 1990, ‹The Noise Trader Approach to Finance’, Journal of Economic Perspectives (Spring), 19–34.

  • Slovic P. 1993. Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis 13: 675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan S. 2005. Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee Members. Journal of Accounting Research 43(2): 291–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre K., Anderson J. A. 1984. An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Public Accountants. The Accounting Review 66(3): 516–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanger S. L., Chewning G. E. 2001. The Effect of Internal Audit Outsourcing on Financial Analysts’ Perceptions of External Auditor Independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20(2): 115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh S. H., Wong T. J. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient. The Accounting Review 68(2): 346–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallario C. W. 2003. Internal Audit Active Ingredient in Reform Mix. Financial Executive 19(4): 26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Muñoz S. C. 2005. Corporate Governance Reforms: Redefined Expectations of Audit Committee Responsibilities and Effectiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 62(2):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaelen T. 1981. Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signalling: An Empirical Study. Journal of Financial Economics 9(2): 139–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P. 1996. The Relation Between a Prior Earnings Forecast by Management and Analysts Response to a Current Management Forecast. The Accounting Review 7(1): 103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization. Journal of Law and Economics 36(1): 453–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M.: 2002, Earnings restatements: A Capital Market Perspective. Working paper, New York University.

  • Zucker L. 1986. Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 53–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Portland State University, Portland, OR, 97207-5798, U.S.A.

    Elizabeth Dreike Almer

  2. Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, 30144, U.S.A.

    Audrey A. Gramling

  3. W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-3606, U.S.A.

    Steven E. Kaplan

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Dreike Almer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Audrey A. Gramling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven E. Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven E. Kaplan.

Additional information

Data Availability: The data are available upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almer, E.D., Gramling, A.A. & Kaplan, S.E. Impact of Post-restatement Actions Taken by a Firm on Non-professional Investors’ Credibility Perceptions. J Bus Ethics 80, 61–76 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9442-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9442-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation